Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis issue: Separating reporting and policy

[Jim Fenton <[e-mail]>]

On 5/27/19 11:19 AM, Dilyan Palauzov wrote:
> Hello Jim,
>
> Do you want to split yourself reporiting and policy and create two 
> separate documents, or do you know somebody wiliing to perform the 
> separation?  I cannot imagine why shall one want to read and 
> understand only reporting or only policy and thus I do net understand 
> for which target group will be these separated documents. The current 
> documents are suitable to achieve their aim.  (Well, to contradict 
> myself, I would like to read and understand all the RFCs, so a single 
> RFC containing all current RFCs would be enough, but obviously, I 
> cannot read and understand such RFC).


Dilyan,

I didn't follow the latter portion of your message entirely, but yes, I 
think I understand the problems that DMARC filtering and reporting are 
intended to solve.

To your initial question, unless a bunch of other people speak up in 
favor of the split I'm proposing, it won't have WG consensus so we don't 
need to consider who does the editorial work involved.

-Jim