IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Been Quiet Around Here - Org Domain? Tree Walk?

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Mon, 04 April 2022 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693373A0806 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=uqDHMBNf; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=BrJ3ROmL
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVYIqo71AjqG for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60F443A07FB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 06:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61438F8027E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:14:08 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1649078048; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=yEZg6po8Rn+AYppAdTC7+Qy25yPmTZDutYQmcPCkp6c=; b=uqDHMBNfEbPlwOS3Vf6BaroAcJuQTw23IFLmfMYlHpf5H3Xjzo4aAkVDSUx5AIGZGWrB7 NSEGjboNLaFU7KvCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1649078048; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=yEZg6po8Rn+AYppAdTC7+Qy25yPmTZDutYQmcPCkp6c=; b=BrJ3ROmLoW+wY8oVlFaEbjXjv0b/tdHXkEievzEhH2+5YvObiq0qZtk6UVjdeMumoA1kU F6+11U3xSMfvpgQqTj+9YxjGn0FqnZCnIB2b54u52jPRUVIZHnsN85MJSJjQ17xw/BxhiBb tbhpYhOyuzIdl7m9fJAf/QD3XuI+88QARVKWDKwDZ7pKBhzcPNQdJ3WmhKY1Hrjxfr3qU0c eFkFdqCJXgtm+QaeK8BKkGJNJTPyLY62I7gnSf0PQMqkdlxozCadbgwKB53zbfouqOd5FGC LN2oEqUiovDrSMmWDZW16IL9zGZeV7Y8ERbl/zlFLJqjAhmrnjbFBJorzoaw==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3B7F801B7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2022 09:14:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:14:07 -0400
Message-ID: <4570053.8rGbQFW28E@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <bed4a39d-26b3-2b86-2d8a-daabadbf49dd@tana.it>
References: <20220317195040.E6EFD3954931@ary.qy> <14DD6AAE-AE27-4A43-A082-216E81CC0D9E@kitterman.com> <bed4a39d-26b3-2b86-2d8a-daabadbf49dd@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/FFdLWRhxGNqVKf3ZCGvmh4jkktc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Been Quiet Around Here - Org Domain? Tree Walk?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2022 13:14:15 -0000

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 12:15:23 PM EDT Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> On Mon 21/Mar/2022 23:02:03 +0100 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On March 21, 2022 5:42:42 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> 
wrote:
> >> According to the definition, two identical domains having psd=y
> >> are in strict alignment but not in relaxed alignment, which is
> >> somewhat counterintuitive. >
> > 
> > Actually, no:
> > 
> > "If this process does not determine the Organizational Domain, then
> > 
> >     the initial target domain is the Organizational Domain."
> > 
> > This text in DMARCbis06 addresses that case.
> 
> While that's true, it could be possible to revise the comparison
> process so as to account for identical domains.  In that case, we
> could avoid to call Organizational Domain one with no DMARC record.

I thought I had covered this already in Section 4.8.  I'll add it to the list 
in the note.

Scott K

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email