Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recipient domain in aggregate reports (#23)

Hans-Martin Mosner <hmm@heeg.de> Mon, 03 May 2021 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <hmm@heeg.de>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10403A0912 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=heeg.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k-Tb7a-6o6go for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.heeg.de (mail.heeg.de [192.109.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4EE3A0909 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from authenticated-user (PRIMARY_HOSTNAME [PUBLIC_IP]) by mail.heeg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 48E4267C0002 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 06:28:00 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heeg.de; s=dkim; t=1620023280; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NrXu9e395cFPp8dkJZvB2bQjNp0p3c9MliAyE9wJVfs=; b=AG4sUyzizayF6FerehNtJtKILzlAXRYMbQ//aetocGA0Sd+U6/4kKTkkUDqKLK3qTMuo6f SSbyTXIEpyI1eVVtRnuHFlHz4QERpWcwNyA1O6pVzs9iW2uAWMw6tFQ3Y1e5KVxsZ9gw0I XLLmPp1J4U03u1Z4xvpy2EiX1uU5gPc=
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20210502203007.2AE156284F0@ary.qy>
From: Hans-Martin Mosner <hmm@heeg.de>
Message-ID: <215690a6-2b04-3355-9999-816a1c3d7126@heeg.de>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 08:27:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210502203007.2AE156284F0@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: de-DE
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heeg.de; s=dkim; t=1620023280; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NrXu9e395cFPp8dkJZvB2bQjNp0p3c9MliAyE9wJVfs=; b=XAAGUXKOBbgJAjyNNsB6I/VdNUp0wq9aeGBo7knh32psWuGM+sZ3VVN5/yhMsTBp7pSYv5 8+jbUzIPvK/pxlhIKK55Kb+bLIGRNz/001h5xKn28ptUCW8pzXRl384NBsFmoKGHOWhilr yL7WEpSr1NWFAZwgiIf1USLAwV2rPx4=
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=heeg.de; t=1620023280; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=irmOFhoTAEHf2EMTqbyybkFzC81yJ6anxQh11si/1b1NohAX422IgYQBrBKW0vaYegidw1 v3gMsfooHEMszhvH7iomWf3EtyfQIlNds4lvIiRiv57NaCUTsjpEMAXkzSBjBErtLn0EVg +cXDshv3EQMjHANsdSuAhEjTWaMsFvk=
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mail.heeg.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=hmm@heeg.de smtp.mailfrom=hmm@heeg.de
Authentication-Results: mail.heeg.de; auth=pass smtp.auth=hmm@heeg.de smtp.mailfrom=hmm@heeg.de
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/FMJ7pfmRBaBzklaklFg9FlT5Cbo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Recipient domain in aggregate reports (#23)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 06:28:09 -0000

Am 02.05.21 um 22:30 schrieb John Levine:
> It appears that Matthäus Wander <mail@wander.science> said:
>> envelope_to allows you to automatically correlate these reports and
>> reconstruct the forwarding path. This helps to identify the culprit who
>> is breaking DKIM signatures, especially with longer forwarding chains.
>> Without envelope_to, reconstructing the mail flow requires guessing and
>> manual work.
> It is none of your business to whom I forward my mail.

True, unless you (generic you, not John L.) make it my business by complaining about not receiving my mail either in a
support request (which may cause quite some work) or in a public forum (which might damage my reputation and even cause
more work).

I am too often in a position of being requested to solve a problem but the requestors don't even provide the minimal
logging info or even error texts to even start analyzing their problem. In such cases I want to be able to look at as
much info as possible so as to provide a decent service.

I don't snoop on mail logging info to satisfy my curiosity or to increase my revenue, but to solve my user's problems.

Whether envelope_to would help my work isn't clear, but apparently it would help Matthäus in his work.

Cheers,
Hans-Martin