Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #11 (and #112) - Proposed language

Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> Wed, 16 June 2021 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dotzero@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA28D3A2204 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s3_Vz8mQlnD4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x834.google.com (mail-qt1-x834.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::834]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AAB53A21BD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x834.google.com with SMTP id u20so2670978qtx.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=YX92Xi2oAkIPHZb+Qh5B5pordt7Q1QE1L/3WZfaG4O4=; b=QU97IFXRPNne3+V6j+yOOiKl6nd8FHVJJ68MOMBnxEDod3KhanVHubH3O0XLaYuzoN QB/YQBKxHdKiP31gF0RtsTOkiLzE0GXZSBubYyJGxT+aswCDhhNlJ7iPnTROUb5rpZyn SimCd0N68Yk1m1Fin61z/qVkxbjdifEgR0t5YhKeSHjUPiLLYyAp8+IXc28s4sfUTZ1s bHfcndixNfGychIF9+B4iTNQH1Ff9epT/7lOSn4B79PwGLqeUsrDhxPTGZ1SOXLvQu/v k2UoIdXZ+crp0zFaEqmA754cYMScHFbJJOVOfstxtwtI21SDqhHCo4SS9cEffa9OxbFc Qpvg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YX92Xi2oAkIPHZb+Qh5B5pordt7Q1QE1L/3WZfaG4O4=; b=gpb5Pj80mydVIYdWcTpreG8Lo5Z5TfX0fr/43tfOCKzekgMzNb4dFX/wxcJ2v2pM05 ZhrGEBvdSwkxt8qGKZueZq1xg3ae3D4nC8saz1tW41tP+l8dZFs4aSoxTYDplaWBRVZ9 qBiR2OSKLl1D8FCF3+Z4FrsLZ/Gc3hkHaKcBTd9qCaSTbIuZswLs6nUz8hN8bpd3UC/t XbhqlO/UP2+MzYlPJfW9m9pqrxTdqGDsI3HlEVXADDLtzTjdrwoVaFULBxH8TuyK/e0P Hf1Qj1n+n0wk2OUwNSzqFKnf4ZBgYZgvmNN5yzSE4qz6ggRzY9Iav1CmYSNWJ17qcVQg U84g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FNU4BOpJ/7a1L2r+7ChC1LW7XnSdabCdavxFd8qaKt/uXPs0c vxDRYDFzAiVsI7XAk4OTQfeWvONbudR0D1sv6CqbpSao
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz76sYpTZTH9+sAXXH57bQ5+l8jPPlNsKb5LGL8iQU3CtVw2hBkoJRfqlB/VMq3/Lb8RjtPFX1RT6aXrg5L3ms=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1098:: with SMTP id a24mr1204909qtj.34.1623868112983; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 11:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <71e61630-0bc8-c9f1-6e7c-5267889c15af@tana.it> <20210616180222.53DC311FBCDC@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20210616180222.53DC311FBCDC@ary.qy>
From: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:28:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJ4XoYeBDekxPzPsjxpt-MC2Jt-bk0TLyiTWuP+XXNB+YYyD7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000095b0805c4e642bf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/FYLGYBkmzhfkcQVPirxRS768hZ4>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #11 (and #112) - Proposed language
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:28:40 -0000

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 2:02 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> It appears that Alessandro Vesely  <vesely@tana.it> said:
> >It might make sense to reject that ~30% which doesn't even have an
> >organizational domain (dubbed totally astray in my previous post).  But I
> still
> >receive From: <please.post@publicly.invalid> on a mailing list.
> Rejecting that
> >risks getting unsubscribed.  Perhaps mailing lists deserve a special
> permission...
>
> Or perhaps mailing lists should refrain from forwarding messages from
> cowards who
> use fake addresses and don't sign their mail.
>
> Either way, I still don't see what this has to do with DMARC.  Let's close
> ticket #112 and stop.
>
> R's,
> John
>

+1

Michael Hammer