Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 30 March 2020 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068163A14BA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MkNnpq1Sq62e for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C254A3A14B9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id b187so5172005vkh.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GwXtVeXUzKRKr7ojBXXQkcVwvbiHmBcTNRMuooZfY+I=; b=JpZXgAidLe4sp9WbCGutalITrn7zTrgJXQuot3+F3gxrrtePqz7QjL2gtMO3U8cjxZ 6OWuGXU1/1AsBkqLxyfZx3nBJMeOfQ8jZqRVucgl3xNza58AEfHppzTGYuBl0SwAtWl8 qn8rF9NOLQ26FfVPm89f5LoDD4zju5epk5VFpnmTDTY4VnGSRPRGjSdpjVIAob7/qhwO BP5jIZKy1efUhmhoxPn2n9RhBRKLhBe11x3XOzIDnNyEq5zCNYcNhuAl02lPG3R1LlES a5drIt/hyObkKCKKJWMCDKH0FHmm1huqrytSX2F6JeUSsYQvgeaqAg+x786Yq9y6SRld 4LGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GwXtVeXUzKRKr7ojBXXQkcVwvbiHmBcTNRMuooZfY+I=; b=Qgl+9srcm57kf4f163dxUbQj2fyx1o3S8FfC8Gxa9C3kH2zhc8FeYBjk17E57+ih33 o4d2j8UAZa6FNR0VnkR+P/o8HMGCp8ZVowJrO3OzGlcsYDvCuWKPrGV9uozDVJADyA7z vSfrBM9HWmeT3caSKNw7WaWzKIYbN3Dnj42XzC2qz3RxZq/BHYrbPeO4UoTJNOs87OzV L1Y0isHjV2h5NJ6bxo7DuaatrWTJGjgEiLAnjxeU6ZhAtvw6N3hdfih30OsH+XMOC51E grctX04y466SAWovPvew2VnMt2moQRDEjjborxLTyH4HoxkGeHXFytH+RhzKUTqMQptv dfbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pubua/rGzRLjARrXRgGtmBDL5sZI55SVCArgNplv4o6R5CMEc8+Q CBWwErOo3l0w3AEevuJjV9ahqLBcQMKADzz3lMs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLTTs1x8hLtUdAhd67U5NigEOREkLtEe3x4ZcKZDNlqm5pGHblOOafIFpMAMavPPDoKbDv0iOpwcgg9z6rYcYc=
X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cdc7:: with SMTP id u7mr10222981vkn.8.1585607942773; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABa8R6tTPAtEyPRSGbWKafZVZ4u8v8sN1VpTpMLQCia2_+5zRg@mail.gmail.com> <20200330212312.341EB16CFEA5@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20200330212312.341EB16CFEA5@ary.qy>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:38:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZ5c29gNG97gkGBsKW9mauKey+ftSNgqF51Mx=ZV0ABpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Brandon Long <blong@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ea0d505a21a1ec4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Fc2M8sTSwmSu78SqrkolzuVHZ8E>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Definition of "value" in RFC8601
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:39:05 -0000

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:23 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <
> CABa8R6tTPAtEyPRSGbWKafZVZ4u8v8sN1VpTpMLQCia2_+5zRg@mail.gmail.com> you
> write:
> >-=-=-=-=-=-
> >
> >Hmm, we didn't include this in RFC 8616 either, I could imagine that it
> >should be punycoded also, though it really depends on whether in 6532 or
> >5322.
>
> This is another mistake in the ABNF in 8601.  The point of 6532 is
> that with the exception of Message-IDs, any header fields that used to
> be limited to ASCII can now contain UTF-8 printable characters.
>

Does someone have a fix in mind that could be submitted as an erratum?  The
intent was indeed to make the authserv-id either a plain old ASCII domain
name or an A-label which doesn't need quoting.  I missed that RFC 6532
didn't update "value", unfortunately.

-MSK