[dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 26 June 2019 21:08 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9296F12003F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhKiA6i4a6qr for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E77371200F1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id m23so22810lje.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FDcHhquc6+GynzeB2SGojQp7CcsaCs7xkkLh6Eh3dzg=; b=gor605i/VY76eFffCJesF6iCLgRjKDmN2aJ+JzR3Kop+Isqu1Hg5HQVqdDxRj0Ub9W 36yzoPup1fH0QLvUF0MwuLA54VRw2TDUPP2115EbwXpL+iCzCGa08IAbQ0pq2yZ4fwKi JtgDljookipgK2LU99iBsYQ8+fG1Y9Agr4Ch1dcWKS7ioJfx5GxfNhl8NIDk2irpbxuf UpIq/8dXF5klu/A3JH/+eSehsZBEzj6aJaFIb6Vx9haDQMfdc7yX40E5zFxW+1ap9Dn5 U9cushhdMywvvrKIOoAZ9DSWk6eMay8o9SU0GF08oM3XWUwu1/s7xGwrm0YG6TZnQa3G 7RAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FDcHhquc6+GynzeB2SGojQp7CcsaCs7xkkLh6Eh3dzg=; b=cfhITRJa4SYN8SWY81HvopU+ZQ7k1eXpEiCukVCRcBWqUycKhh7gc8X5IreKM06+hw EQKJifaSU7kY8ynzXU+6x9bD49Zq/PAvd0HQcri7z+ur/8xxbfprngBs5l0LHAnG/H8H deR5xS8XZ0nYVusl+s90Mcagq0DOIKahRH/I3gWbOuLYnKMCxbKMGrAeERZR8jWfTfFu klfpCVc6dt3M1CaZfhEKoUDEZW6jxhwpk6s3toGSaGLjQYEpqBMZdCf1xKAu+mYpaNJ7 rqKbywxt+1cZUZLSgrQB9BCw68NrM5zhseosDdB6capGMBtPQFa1PsmJruemZ928HTz9 zazw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVsKc+pADZH2rVmHMGsll31UTasXo/p5BFK3OGDXT1Q8ihqixEo zHH4iaPkvHNRrOLbR5xHUS2uUb6oYJ41M+RxjaLfyFys
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjeQBO+WWEIMeNCKqjySdQf9v3qRARuVIy2aTe9MnxZEJeUD87u4vhuYC+lBn434bIjbdGCtD2M8eLe91vEs4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:870f:: with SMTP id m15mr182045lji.223.1561583301649; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:08:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fb6923058c4071c9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Fr_R22oKe7Rc2I32AH_aZQpWPlI>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:08:27 -0000
This message begins Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dmarc-psd, which is currently at version 04. An 05 may appear shortly with some text changes that were previously discussed on the list; these do not include any technical changes (I believe) so the author is free to update with only those changes as planned. Please review the document and submit your feedback by Wednesday, July 17th. We would ideally like to have enough responses to support our claim to the IESG that the document clearly has working group consensus. Note that we will be in pre-meeting draft embargo at that time so a new version dealing with any feeback cannot appear until IETF 105 begins on the 22nd. I'm planning to do my own review as the document shepherd with an eye toward consumption by readers with only a passing familiarity with DMARC. If anyone wants to join me in looking at it through that lens, you'd be welcome. -MSK, co-chairin'
- [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Scott Kitterman
- [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Workin… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Wo… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Wo… Scott Kitterman
- [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limitation… Scott Kitterman
- [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: W… Scott Kitterman
- [dmarc-ietf] Implemnetations was: Re: Working Gro… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Stan Kalisch
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Hollenbeck, Scott
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Stan Kalisch
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Introduction context was: Re: Wo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Mention ICANN/operational limita… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Ian Levy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Richard C
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Ian Levy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call: draft-i… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Chudow, Eric B CIV NSA DSAW (USA)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Ian Levy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Ian Levy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: R… Kurt Andersen