Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy for the Author Domain - dmarcbis-06
John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 06 April 2022 16:04 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3113A1BAC
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=iecc.com header.b=rPfU1rho;
dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=taugh.com header.b=fV6vPzrY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id UeISyioQK43T for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com
[IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1203A1AF6
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 09:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 50658 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2022 16:03:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness;
s=c5df.624db9ea.k2204; bh=IFEUdTA1eG7+fnD1/NpcsiKl4SGoqlPP0JHPNK8Z/3o=;
b=rPfU1rho6UQ011q2trx6dt5fYqONARPi1Tuwy7Rljr/JJSeMcEEwLu+Ev4/Gbxrb4Bdxi0uezABIWWRtJV9fKNO63Mwrp4Z9gFywvkycJJ35gvo0saVV2uHfvz/QSpwywlZocNM+jrU8vv5LBtpm1XXnzrzDHV0nwNuqN0MBinFt1hx+MXKPU30Sl0VxEsnL8NHO86I1kYR11KR9DPvYkIjLHUGWRahfQa7qYpz2OeiEhrqff/ujOQGeWG2ks/qQpxfmrkGr6mZwzizV8w0yN20ANhwPLqoeJJ0PjyDLL1Js8VpTHV1htl+7CG2nZN0Y9QaEe572OLXNu5bsiElgyA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com;
h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness;
s=c5df.624db9ea.k2204; bh=IFEUdTA1eG7+fnD1/NpcsiKl4SGoqlPP0JHPNK8Z/3o=;
b=fV6vPzrYtWleUC72RIoNdlN6Zux02/RYrw8QxUzPdB+1GZIELf/wins5HIeL58iVA9wT7Sv7+z1uNhwZsUSQcMf5tnoMzjDGXy253t4QpAtT29kqj7H54qf0oYyRH8T0pjV+hbQcH1ps/58S9Mf2aKDriHnObzowcwfqODXFdixDIwO6KW/cxX7QOCscr+wgzIpx4aTuNZv1YK9cKa63xLBJq6eCk5ur27I3RLwrGOka+ZqDfIpULE9er0CTcdt7jOm/tsiFpbomn1+hIXrx0IX0h3rf3RyoyEvJ+U+XOl3OO0cMeDYonzdiLbkg1qzuD/tkJPyWURBm8QyxqEekjQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170])
by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170])
with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6;
06 Apr 2022 16:03:54 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501)
id 9D0EA3B482EA; Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:03:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: 6 Apr 2022 12:03:53 -0400
Message-Id: <20220406160353.9D0EA3B482EA@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: sklist@kitterman.com
In-Reply-To: <A2C3A80C-F7F6-4592-862D-C8759A6A4A11@kitterman.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Gf2SHVxcDHXPnchQG5TGv6jOvGw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org,
5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy for the Author Domain - dmarcbis-06
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 16:04:33 -0000
It appears that Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> said: >I see two potential paths out of this: > >1. Slightly expand your proposal to say that if the 5322.From domain has psd=y, then the psd tag is >ignored for all org domain determinations for the message. > >2. Just say explicitly, if you are a PSD, you have to make all three the exact domain (effectively like >strict alignment only). > >The current text says a domain is always its own org domain, so we have (without explaining it anywhere) >defined #2 currently. I think that's good. Looking at the DMARC records for PSD, most of them say strict alignment, so I agree, it's easy to explain and unsurprising. R's, John
- [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbi… internet-drafts
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy for th… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… John Levine