IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Response to a claim in draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 security considerations

"Douglas E. Foster" <fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com> Sun, 19 July 2020 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <btv1==469a0311ee2==fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE22A3A07FF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=bayviewphysicians.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoJBiyk4z0ty for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bayviewphysicians.com (mail.bayviewphysicians.com [216.54.111.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E65433A0475 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 07:46:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1595170008-11fa3107a811940001-K2EkT1
Received: from webmail.bayviewphysicians.com (webmail.bayviewphysicians.com [192.168.1.49]) by mail.bayviewphysicians.com with ESMTP id bYVjx3yd3w5IPg4G (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:46:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com
X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 192.168.1.49
X-SmarterMail-Authenticated-As: fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bayviewphysicians.com; s=s1025; h=from:to:subject; bh=RvVPhvGzhFCsP9vd6DlwTmYC/6yxcfiABP1dPrbEl+A=; b=K/3f8QGc5jyhg9/Aq377NBT8Q691fDFS7Ed+HD3uRmOJwquz2+axmPVPz10F0REYG lzTh6F+K1+iqazHA8BInwJQ7MiEmyzPBvA27AX/i0b68sfz3e+VZw3gUrufkJf6Fx r34rgvKL94kSiMSxKEoF8X1mk16ASmb+NIKzjTx4Y=
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 10:46:39 -0400
Importance: normal
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Response to a claim in draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 security considerations
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_240386616361700"
From: "Douglas E. Foster" <fosterd@bayviewphysicians.com>
X-Barracuda-Connect: webmail.bayviewphysicians.com[192.168.1.49]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1595170008
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384
X-Barracuda-URL: https://mail.bayviewphysicians.com:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at bayviewphysicians.com
X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 562
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 2.45
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=2.45 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=BSF_SC0_TG383d, HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY, MISSING_MID
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.83309 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.14 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header 0.81 HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY BODY: HTML has unbalanced "body" tags 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 1.50 BSF_SC0_TG383d Custom Rule TG383d
Message-Id: <20200719144650.E65433A0475@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/GwkeXHyQdvRrLrVx-dQCHSFrngs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Response to a claim in draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 security considerations
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 14:46:52 -0000

Yes, Gmail is a win for Dave.   User has to hover to see the from address, instead of friendly name, except when the TO does not match the recipient.
null

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email