IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074453A3354 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ou1KCEs2glz4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12d.google.com (mail-lf1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C033A328D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id b18so2648761lfv.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=P8iA9TFpdhinTTm5FgzYanrhamv0xhX/TRTbEHzelG8=; b=LY1iwD7jSSOxVbw1eWsCGJ73qHVNvzmDzSzpyc+EdLCfOjmohIu4+YTsmGbBcOxiU7 QLbqIe9y71tSveyukd2FqVEMOYdZKI3EAzSfZas8207UCk06F2wMwLm867VlEoMFdSRf 9r/tzynzkl43vDZJzNGculAcf7eQ1Wm7dEoRlObHgP6jE3PI4u5CorYD3FcNC5oEyRiS Z39Nlo0u9A6bE+dHGf7b2qHpDyhxSIk0EkKn0wR2SJIvjd0HdeeBIVdTEGS9DROuglO7 e8zwoBe81U/0vGxu8FLvBOAcScX5nm4mI+bnl2mGqFw58R/YWjVbeOhAU/BgnrSlzmzt +3Kg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P8iA9TFpdhinTTm5FgzYanrhamv0xhX/TRTbEHzelG8=; b=PLzZ4XTekVnV8/Oy+Lwftd8ROABJJm0SNEoauuuIfxcfTkyWnTWwTir68k2d7ZzLyE v5b/EPLVac39ypT/j8qT37LUhaTxp/h+1PEb63NJPQ6XcjejwWrXjwe7nYAV3Bdkr9+P ZthfDc3FEvDTH3WEEk7KlkYsHO9I1eSj8W5D379MjzYDCOtDCdIrdd3uumvsiwfKsoMk Tnsf408UWCqLrwa5O2yzt+I7kzsrGV40zPaD4kx1Rl5N9+0StFJi4EyA8Ot0wJ5H4dNA 8GWZogc0VnOM4T3smSQ2qhN+vHPK5kjDS3WHriu/WafKipoCM2Sklyx6j4YhlcKpbjTB u0Wg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531T056LO2HrA5Q0izrXZaSvsZ1ovki5tGd/Xim6WM6m7nHLigp+ 0uXyPNzEjAiHyPPIVUKVVX64NdtYyyl189Pt4Ek=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXJ1lxz8jTBdiuu8t6DnkN5H335+yd5LZZD3n/BCT3NTXABERzGS7+QBtOFxbBRMS2QxNMFz5UyzG4ambM3EM=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:42cd:: with SMTP id n13mr6622552lfl.330.1622228416696; Fri, 28 May 2021 12:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+G9AMvTT9Z77YH6t3cLveanicduo-J5ZkXwcaZ6nBbyVg@mail.gmail.com> <20210528175912.C9D3E8E030F@ary.qy> <CAJ4XoYcvjWXt2pXRqOqaEwfRT7ywqOgE8Q_sNWmN7ij82OUezg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ4XoYcvjWXt2pXRqOqaEwfRT7ywqOgE8Q_sNWmN7ij82OUezg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 15:00:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+GwD6tLgYwxzFp-hkh_pgXMJiKQCPHRjEGC8WxyEWd2iA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008595c505c3687c1b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Gy99xdHv8fRvGpYk8-KBtlGeBrI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #50 (Remove ri= tag) - With Interim Notes
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 19:00:35 -0000

Editors,

I sent y'all a pull request.

Tim

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 2:35 PM Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 1:59 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
>> It appears that Tim Wicinski  <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> said:
>> >-=-=-=-=-=-
>> >
>> >All,
>> >
>> >This is the current text in Section 10.4 of dmarc-bis
>> >
>> >   Names of DMARC tags must be registered with IANA in this new sub-
>> >   registry.  New entries are assigned only for values that have been
>> >   documented in a manner that satisfies the terms of Specification
>> >   Required, per [RFC8126].  Each registration must include the tag
>> >   name; the specification that defines it; a brief description; and its
>> >   status, which must be one of "current", "experimental", or
>> >   "historic".  The Designated Expert needs to confirm that the provided
>> >   specification adequately describes the new tag and clearly presents
>> >   how it would be used within the DMARC context by Domain Owners and
>> >   Mail Receivers.
>> >
>> >I don't believe we can actually remove said tag from the IANA registry,
>> >but we can mark them as "historic", and remove the text from the
>> >new document.
>>
>> Marking it "historic" seems appropriate, since that'll keep future
>> versions
>> of DMARC from using it for something else.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
>> Dummies",
>> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
>>
>
> +1
>
> Michael Hammer
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email