IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 01 August 2019 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7456B120136 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Pzv1Sc1ignA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F9012003E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y17so43290876ljk.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iiD7XnweQ9E7z2jzpjHuC1gQ9X2Bafixx/Gxb2vetGo=; b=lTDcjGDciaZuupg2elkVYf/twVo41ttdrNRzY97yNwaOtxAXFkjJx8e6/IyHgod3+w Mmy9IjttprNIo8iIOfIj8DP62Qrv2K6FIbFwZIFIaD2lf31mmoSLourS0cGu2TCT2/vv TaY4RqcvvVDw2t+frwm6CF6oE/zJarKUmB/jJL8f3aj7Nyx50Lvj/BSjDWoQb3i4vbUB XuvGQE9YIZBQf2oXQI7gd33jYuNAaAbXrJqpq9YiwqQJKslG8eoH0oOE1nnyTcCNCle3 3H+/Ga47YxcwGt5bsY0Sr9fYNscrFdq3P4shMDE75LSHwKmFPzdkrkJMmUkIeNzsvYbX XQiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iiD7XnweQ9E7z2jzpjHuC1gQ9X2Bafixx/Gxb2vetGo=; b=CnrOxUg2x4F/+vwObRViZpbAKRdjmBjr6SL7Hj4wp1NXUQddpXz8/DtosJNq0+02RR Lnb7nxi52Dp5gZSpMC5QUO3Y8dtBmAWYFnXnfxbnqAv+1SLwj179CzdvMCczM/1jfDIf JMg+edcT3w2YMmq34TC45CzK3Et7Oc8XjHTmlvnzOz9iOZK7L83psiNCmwJ4oHI+ZM5e ho6MqhQ41j7hkNe98e4zv72NIhuC73X/15XqkECWy3wxdCC3LR+JvdQ7jOBpdy50J3VC jjhqGx/aiiOgPisHSh5yZPdVSryX6DVuRhZGIBC8QvAXo/q6NQEIyRHWKk81lrc1Vr24 MOow==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+FkLNL1RNYUymqI0rSjZU270OkVFOplDaUM/MMS94kRHFMgyO h+4AV7mi6vd0CdKu/hRcAFa8y7QiQ3nkGeTnurv26Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx+RVP1fWYSwU3p55yg6qdrzsXPvT7REmE/TRXfXak7wVfAgH5lD2aexP/o2wBYnhqwYUHQ/3Ag81yAYzpNiRc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9250:: with SMTP id v16mr65742199ljg.89.1564631259606; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <010001d547b0$63bbdcd0$2b339670$@leemankuiper.nl>
In-Reply-To: <010001d547b0$63bbdcd0$2b339670$@leemankuiper.nl>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 20:47:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbaZeKx_TaaZb9tBnLcDO937TTT2DbwYQr9g-77CfBR4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Freddie Leeman <freddie=40leemankuiper.nl@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ef238058f061a61"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HfNtpbL9EW6LX24HMtxjnRP0-E0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate reporting options tag name 'ao'
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2019 03:47:44 -0000

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 7:58 AM Freddie Leeman <freddie=
40leemankuiper.nl@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> 0: Generate a DMARC aggregate report for every message, regardless of its
> alignment.
>
1: Generate a DMARC aggregate report if any underlying authentication
> mechanism produced something other than an aligned "pass" result.
>
> d: Generate a DMARC aggregate report if the message had a signature that
> failed evaluation, regardless of its alignment.
>
> s: Generate a DMARC aggregate report if the message failed SPF evaluation,
> regardless of its alignment.
>

Do you want to include an option for selecting based on the ARC result?
You called out DKIM and SPF individually, so I wonder if this is something
worth including.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email