IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

ned+dmarc@mrochek.com Wed, 23 December 2020 20:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+dmarc@mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2217F3A0A0B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:19:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mrochek.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PceHc6v1lqk3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [98.153.82.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B9E3A09CD for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:18:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01RTIJD8ACCG00BQ3A@mauve.mrochek.com> for dmarc@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:13:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mrochek.com; s=201712; t=1608754435; bh=sx6GB16Zb6bH54P+UfO0Hh95XC+Obw+Afw2NntK+SVc=; h=From:Cc:Date:Subject:In-reply-to:References:To:From; b=YvDhy/JsVwCCzh5C7vDqNsxEksccNzqPpPl4d1ZhJzUYjr/+hsq8xNJ3ws7RRDJtg m46T+VC9WFE3XMZtDNNSKtxh7FJqLjuE1qcakqU3Z+Fxlz37TZCIKWw0ytmzRCvpPZ xRU/5xBPClt/WGVkxpttMNpLOltO2BdfhpWVN2ZQ=
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01RTICDLNOW000CBED@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for dmarc@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:13:51 -0800 (PST)
From: ned+dmarc@mrochek.com
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Message-id: <01RTIJD56D0600CBED@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:13:09 -0800
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 23 Dec 2020 12:03:28 -0800" <CABuGu1qYWOO8xk3kvu=zG5O0SgBiv9CpjzjuWEvFgf1BS2gJKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20201218023900.E73B82ACBB2B@ary.qy> <4a43ffaa-3987-c892-cce7-56f18888cdf5@tana.it> <39125012-e356-d62d-36fd-a7ff25a9f59f@taugh.com> <e6880ba9-f5f3-1050-25c0-658551187512@tana.it> <6bba023-d3d9-63a5-8441-11dac9a05e28@taugh.com> <74051a64-871a-db72-b5d9-1be374e23015@tana.it> <a323077-9b64-555b-3561-62cdc93819fd@taugh.com> <a8281e16-9417-5189-df73-79ea0a865fbd@tana.it> <c713b9ae-a364-1ae0-e79-55f61624aa3d@taugh.com> <3034face-b6fc-0ce2-fa1b-f59210bd6f5b@tana.it> <46339b38-3b24-bcb7-5e73-8a97038ed69@taugh.com> <3997c81d-3b30-0823-a752-fb1d60a44593@tana.it> <74a5c37-19a6-6f6f-a51d-6e5cca5b29e8@taugh.com> <CAJ4XoYdXWTgADpdL1eJuYGnpSY038vj-FW_x1f2rEp1JL0r2oA@mail.gmail.com> <01RTICXKLL3E0085YQ@mauve.mrochek.com> <c5f7413e-52c1-6710-16e5-63f59d2c24b9@taugh.com> <CABuGu1qYWOO8xk3kvu=zG5O0SgBiv9CpjzjuWEvFgf1BS2gJKg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HptVyJ9SgrfxWRbeGwORagPrhCw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:19:00 -0000

> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:10 AM John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> > On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote:
> > >  Failure reports provide detailed information about the failure of a
> > single
> > >  message or a group of similar messages failing for the same reason. They
> > >  are meant to aid in cases where a domain owner is unable to detect why
> > >  failures reported in aggregate form did occur. It is important to note
> > >  these reports can contain either the header or the entire content of a
> > >  failed message, which in turn may contain personally identifiable
> > >  information, which should be considered when decoding whether or not to
> > >  generate such reports.
> >
> > Ship it.
> >

> With one minor correction, I agree. The minor correction is in the last
> sentence: s/decoding/deciding/

Yes, sorry about that.

				Ned


> --Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email