Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-06.txt
Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sat, 02 April 2022 23:29 UTC
Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59423A17E0
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 16:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.11
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral
reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)"
header.d=kitterman.com header.b=TE7yh3wf; dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=kitterman.com header.b=Va2LjFvA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id SIibuGHrveoN for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 2 Apr 2022 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com
[64.20.48.66])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAC83A1399
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com
[IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169])
by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 767E6F80278
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 19:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com;
i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1648942191; h=from : to :
subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version
: content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from;
bh=/zW5FkeWe1qzJ8tRwY853HdmgJEMShlbqUYI9RVrQ94=;
b=TE7yh3wfyiJ73AA/zeZ0Co+gBAnp8cUW3YXOPUO3bv4W1ecnH6kQ2DmuIRvV2J9NZhE7W
E0PE5l+R+boMDuODQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com;
i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1648942191; h=from : to :
subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version
: content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from;
bh=/zW5FkeWe1qzJ8tRwY853HdmgJEMShlbqUYI9RVrQ94=;
b=Va2LjFvAcuVR2D/2g1GutFGjohsvUQQb9HRznBqbQqEh1jNTvQJJASHbMh+dBygxR/H62
imYjZNTFZDctDid+fUEMU1RWeHYlDVpv7Tprp4e2WGZ8/Gp3khJVdGXpmqLLR3eQhcN/Hez
HyWmHKIBxi1TkHBXpacwnXhzxxaYYEoNGdV9PVPQB1ITagReesRgLKTyXlOOvpnBTHYpxL/
awc6rhIEfoyYrI0GnxvN1pISLJCk3b53HQadAEzx3Qhb6mcEaS7gXk8mNQ0PfmluB8H3rub
nOARaNsqxuhYiChQHYrT+5ojEYNihnhxjXoc4o/MP9jvhsvsGpmLc2yKlemA==
Received: from zini-1880.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net
[72.81.252.22])
by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431B5F80026
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Apr 2022 19:29:51 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 19:29:50 -0400
Message-ID: <4364250.cxnYrCVWOr@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfzk5WQRx9xy=H42C6FMim+qCoUC4c7uEwGOU8ce0g5mmw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <164789584226.30456.9564261134406099481@ietfa.amsl.com>
<CAH48Zfzk5WQRx9xy=H42C6FMim+qCoUC4c7uEwGOU8ce0g5mmw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/I0VRI5BAE9pfpTau2Rs4dEZcays>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2022 23:29:58 -0000
Before we picked 5, we looked and that's sufficient to capture all the boundaries. It's not a problem. This was discussed on the list, I don't recall when. Scott K On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 9:55:56 PM EDT Douglas Foster wrote: > Suppose a FROM address domain has the lower-bound of 5 segments, and that a > verified DKIM signature exists using a child domain somewhere below that, > perhaps with 7 segments. > > Are the names automatically considered to be aligned, without a tree walk, > because a private registry boundary will not occur below level 5? Or > should a scope-limited tree walk be performed between the child domain and > the FROM domain to be sure that no boundary exists? > > Doug > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 4:50 PM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > > directories. > > This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, > > Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF. > > > > Title : Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, > > > > and Conformance (DMARC) > > > > Authors : Todd M. Herr > > > > John Levine > > > > Filename : draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-06.txt > > Pages : 62 > > Date : 2022-03-21 > > > > Abstract: > > This document describes the Domain-based Message Authentication, > > Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) protocol. > > > > DMARC permits the owner of an email author's domain name to enable > > verification of the domain's use, to indicate the Domain Owner's or > > Public Suffix Operator's message handling preference regarding failed > > verification, and to request reports about use of the domain name. > > Mail receiving organizations can use this information when evaluating > > handling choices for incoming mail. > > > > This document obsoletes RFC 7489. > > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/ > > > > There is also an HTML version available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-06.html > > > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-06 > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org: > > :internet-drafts > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmarc mailing list > > dmarc@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
- [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbi… internet-drafts
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy for th… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Douglas Foster
- [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dma… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ruminating the tree walk Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] 5.5.4. Publish a DMARC Policy fo… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] PSD vs org, 5.5.4. Publish a DMA… John Levine