Re: [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth
Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> Sat, 09 February 2019 00:06 UTC
Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C62E6130E79 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:06:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYP55S10ibSA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:06:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x134.google.com (mail-it1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2079130E62 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:06:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x134.google.com with SMTP id r6so13510158itk.0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:06:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cktlhFuzLu/ptXuKuBAzWOQyHA6dVs6B3LS3SxH6amE=; b=BsU37Ww6UoMAiLtIDasYTqvRLuzBA0hL3PeW4Lx6gYkrozkE+6gmzW69UnXu9g7zSW NtXPhjSsWbs+RATwMH9NHssTA+gM1R0aSYoq0Y0wWCzWe1xtr3KOwlySzVipaYz1UN4i jZlcdW2k0kCvrfqRXd/EPfLOLP405O7Xmiahc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cktlhFuzLu/ptXuKuBAzWOQyHA6dVs6B3LS3SxH6amE=; b=gSdwcWcYUQRuNv/JVYCwDUycRFLsNHqNb4p/J4ut4O10A4vCY4xPuN7PTbUFRICnep KrSRUHZy5b7RNg6elrZrpYa+MN3D9HgxVUZ4Wr8JS9UGOMLLolyWNr24nEd1yWWI5tRA +lwld+qHpvHZAziy6klYK7N3rkLiWDb7cdOuyvMd8D35p3cD5IW9bJR3InVcagYF7d2u sI971z5brG8bQUs1tJ5XnMOSC/ED3NZ6a+X373J/sxBJmySBs+yKvGOzdpqb3rSsPAau qPrMNvuy3oXwPVNu3GWopP6iyziUWuLUHt1JtMmGQXIIbDs/XPaBPAiva4rgx6UtjxTO 29FQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubGICQMnCm52vYSXrtOqGICTYoGcM/zvkvEqQ/Y+ZHd3seBq16q yjZvLT7ErYxqy8uiMScq8+FVg2kwd9NIyEqSiBFJxA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IahDeEMOBqLQdrp89gviFaLUySxZ0YrkNLPIjXWYzqkRaU0BxZzk4hbvInCZPjIwZTkJWqeLVRaoCstzSjgSr8=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6306:: with SMTP id p6mr14282794iog.196.1549670790478; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:06:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD2i3WPm8VyRN7yCnQYNdpWLATb2XYaq-9jzOcmpcDNz6taSHQ@mail.gmail.com> <20190208225416.628D9200DFF277@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20190208225416.628D9200DFF277@ary.qy>
From: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:06:16 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ps8NDAKac1TwB8gAPReHXqFyiBxgGa6gvj7ZGRCRz6cg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fc544605816ad889"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/IG4WOqdbimtCOMsygr_OJLrX0uw>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 00:06:34 -0000
Would you care to post that version? The nits check is whining about some out of date refs and one down level citation. --Kurt On Fri, Feb 8, 2019, 14:54 John Levine <johnl@taugh.com wrote: > In article < > CAD2i3WPm8VyRN7yCnQYNdpWLATb2XYaq-9jzOcmpcDNz6taSHQ@mail.gmail.com> you > write: > >> Does anyone have any issues to raise with draft-ietf-dmarc-eaiauth? > >> If I don't see anything within the next week, I will hit the "request > >> publication" button in the datatracker. > > I have a version that fixes a few typos and has a new paragraph pointing > out that DKIM relaxed header canonicalization folds the header names to > lower case, but those names are still restricted to ASCII so nothing > changes. > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > dmarc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
- [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmarc-ea… Barry Leiba
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmar… Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmar… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmar… Kurt Andersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] We're ready with draft-ietf-dmar… John R Levine