IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 21 July 2021 03:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10DB3A104E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdWJaxsg813I for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68B893A1047 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2d.google.com with SMTP id gh6so332743qvb.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=guKpx3+HuBp8dQHMF0ZiD1r2tQ6JUtDaHlzNa7B8d6w=; b=cMw1Wt3qwyTjyVZuMnJxumgrhUttv5mNVnR1YTbgS9UshC93DMOxeIIRCU9V90aA/O M1xybCOsl8iFcWEU8Q4cyr9fDsWPq76ep5riNOrD85u6CUXsANa5mlzkT1ikMB40adbY wDJeJnNs/ZV4YB0kY1p49JZchl7sp4LRKhcsj5eXVFnMUv4m0lzmKsQu4gOC5xaIZ8F2 5BGRsxaXTuBjnLoIB5mehB3KcwezC84CDu+uZJLn4xiYdNVqz1WYHPDxvVGYsGEcYDF5 tXNPqYux0qACwY4CXseb2OCd0mMwBxM9pbJRjVuzsbxeLGOuslUxFVvUHUZlDH9lVUas kJAQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=guKpx3+HuBp8dQHMF0ZiD1r2tQ6JUtDaHlzNa7B8d6w=; b=fbCcQQOuRE5FzFJ5uG9Uu5iTL0Dis1OObV7E77UjmdQo0GpjBc4tjqSo1d4uuSJ3yl sf+SFnjcrCoujtq+O6tW/KuH+4q9SAvYQ9Nwp2b5NjGtojHLYtLHwi/6+oogB3+gDkil fWz2lnfiMlAoswfLU0YokCMdhBRrD9LO7G5A9fVI2ju7IMvPDRyx1MbDRiaCWwA4mLW2 XhLxxeqqrhzHaMJ6WyW/Wr+ncNvb/TM5nZU4dJ/xkJde2CgFsYrW7eezTgdbG+shujuu iZQcV3aXni84ShUHTq0T2LBUR8hzAIRZebAn6t8vd36a0Ph+P81+ygKEi81JDhLWTdKg rqTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/1MD6dG4AAiABpsm7WVY+2Z12aL28jErfZZZgh3Krv/nU5IHS FjKPOHy6bktPeuzj05KRRWQ3W5bbTNpiTA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykcq8/5odhI2FQDlNT8qgnGLqHaPn/fhW4j2NMcPb0Y5u8HwShY0BFftRX8hLN9yEncXphoQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f6c6:: with SMTP id d6mr34064370qvo.30.1626839248147; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (50-110-95-0.clbg.wv.frontiernet.net. [50.110.95.0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id az37sm10392377qkb.91.2021.07.20.20.47.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2021 23:47:23 -0400
Message-Id: <317CD7F5-2724-4D91-999C-8B47E863E3FD@gmail.com>
References: <8a209f99-6409-2073-7daf-b3d80702d562@gmail.com>
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8a209f99-6409-2073-7daf-b3d80702d562@gmail.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/I_wi1AlMNCoUusdX9FFI2Kh4nio>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ratchets - Disallow PCT 1-99
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 03:47:35 -0000

I like Dave’s idea here about leaving them changing their value to none. 



Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 20, 2021, at 22:45, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 7/20/2021 7:04 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> I suppose we should have a Former DMARC Tags registry to prevent them
>> from being recycled with a different meaning.
> 
> 
> Or keep the current entry, changing the specification citation to NONE, or even just keep the existing one.
> 
> d/
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> dcrocker@gmail.com
> 408.329.0791
> 
> Volunteer, Silicon Valley Chapter
> Information & Planning Coordinator
> American Red Cross
> dave.crocker2@redcross.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email