Re: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis

Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com> Wed, 23 January 2019 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@sethblank.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B21126BED for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:07:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UlrS8jve9oXa for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 786FA124C04 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id a11so2144697otr.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:07:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sethblank-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zPBODxlKt7+V4JXK9qNc9sXPc7YrJFPwWWPpsq1DnqM=; b=ukP8He2AUktG/ZdLq8xHg0HYtwhpdxRXz+zMrvRkKThTY7ouYWHarZmQQXVbPuS2G4 qjyayW1K+UbYiSJbHtj2lEODIUIB4JffcruGKq8Ed3PqxesPUfhhUxF+a4yhgD1GfBoz NjaVll3XMMMuE7Y/RJK5NP5LHgqRxofbAZUecCvhQpmIaH48LAfipL23QHOGDJtjWuDi kMAFgkA11fKGJ7ART/+Xfql/gpnQtP4v3/hjhSHYhUrYl/XpxH5uD7gtj7E8jsnnQ6gV tZxMBmDqQ4hpdyBgEwLevtgkgdEMvnx6y4GreVpv4ETFCn2kUB4Gc/aG1TG8GgUaQQXA EPOg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zPBODxlKt7+V4JXK9qNc9sXPc7YrJFPwWWPpsq1DnqM=; b=p1AOwjZM8rs9A0TxJwETYlxkwsgo6zDBLZsHItDy/hZ0ZKqBc2a091PlNHoreKJTOo bUiav7Y3UpRICb8mEk3TNOY/ow/LsBFi3OxpB/ie+9iA3kYOPe5Pu9Bou1Trvgdsz2qg f0JUeVmMzaLxEVfYAKc5LmLCBFCsaCdY8rv4wyHFWU8/vtpUQyVcXWoyOY/+VKJqlM+Q 0DQ3U3wvkJgk0huGuXMHV7Ki8OVjjVfEz13rpeeLBa/OaaFFBnKn1E2PIUoKNQJDhROO YCAufnFx+Y7AXEI/tTo7bB32PJU9h8w4fVk8DmDiAuSSPUcMZ0yRHT1lI+yV9HZIGIQ5 qRIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeY7tcR6qmEf9dbc6t+o6d3RyM5vxv4LTdiJX1kTLNyG/6aAn2B Qg5azpnxBkUf0q05nbKKtETBRMKoKOX0SeF56Y5M7xak
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6SdW/qy6Rb1TXFmtfLdkkfjqwQPLI93cwD85gTo+JwB2MPGR7A3Rm2Zeh6EJ2HOtHQGcgaxPZH3YO1Y5V4SME=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:d83:: with SMTP id 3mr1524546ots.361.1548256058384; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:07:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwZdRym=kj9qD1f8d9ShNL3o09f+gGbyc2Q-1F1HtsMpYQ@mail.gmail.com> <B9E281E0-D50B-4D34-A392-76F7FE2E82B8@kitterman.com> <CAL0qLwYWVjj7pVnA4ouSTi0u=CBbQ0bSog6pQBrUghtD9v8pmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYWVjj7pVnA4ouSTi0u=CBbQ0bSog6pQBrUghtD9v8pmA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Seth Blank <seth@sethblank.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 07:07:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD2i3WNLiN05ZurEbaWn35BD2fO_jU2uSDwRajeojzeM_bLkFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000061d2ee058021743f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/J3WAv3mR7GL8cj6crdEgXImQsDI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Post-IESG Review edits to RFC7601bis
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:07:41 -0000

The changes look good and clean to me, and allow anyone reading 7601bis to
understand the deprecated entries without needing to hunt them down in
obsoleted documents.

On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:10 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:09 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
> wrote:
>
>> According to the rules of the registry (as described in RFC 7601), a
>> designated expert can change entries to deprecated without a specification.
>>
>
> True, but that's not the only change here.  Not carrying deprecated
> entries into 7601bis was identified as something cleaner than carrying them
> forward and then immediately deprecating them.
>
> No need to tie this to 7601bis.  Just ask IANA to make the changes (since
>> you're the primary designated expert).
>
>
> Yes, but since I'm also editing this thing now anyway, I may as well take
> advantage of it.  And this way the audit trail is more visible, if that
> matters to someone.
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>