Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions
Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Mon, 23 November 2020 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428143A0C25
for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:34:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id i1DwjBaO9D-3 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49C053A0C23
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:34:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id e10so6635258qte.4
for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:34:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=valimail.com; s=google2048;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OHwNXCn4335iUdg7IIse9LBp3Y+nFAMnhqEsdYhrA5I=;
b=VUYLfk/dlrDGOa2stMpYDbQqECfl8KSqZle4iwRvmrnBIE4Wl9cAipwsVIhIQNYxIw
5EqkUFaLD2WLBSu6d4MybiLAVEqgwiUhoiTj3AVbUZdOKw1Ud/NaRaU3nG1V982/kgkM
yQsRTQq+OIg1h/K3g1hfJwMsTRCe1YycJKjeQWlQnFA6f5sgpjieE3xCyNtIadrIouLY
qNMnaZL0QcJ/kPSY3NjYf/TLfkKkuNgADWCESNYwKyocounzvjrJVPPRDlowgMyZnERo
mz/I2EC6lMhSDRJ3lsZSfQ99ZrMt+1CQouwQ81+Yg6MHvK6vTjRu2c8rvv55HK2wFkw9
UKHA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=OHwNXCn4335iUdg7IIse9LBp3Y+nFAMnhqEsdYhrA5I=;
b=OV/gSWAwuHoTSw058dpxxuy4x3+Uzjem4YwCBuuvGaXlezC+PMp6JxRSKpnZCdAxXq
j6bf5GhUQ3R8Y4I2V/a1JmKLD+ewIW7ob5sOVQIumErGB5QaoWaWHKMB28O8UGz4TU+y
Xxl5MLY3fX3gVVb240wJdr+sHGynW7SubQdpHHOQ12xfh7X7fHwqkYk0G7lmBln6JGRB
D1pX6FftRC/H7S6b1LBQwhPbDDIwYTUKoijMyi6pEuVRuXV7Nu6k9gbuKHr2XWfG8YVJ
3+rhyghOpPl5wyDctw5vbRSmjyz9e4oeXirV8zYeh2Z0ouWA7nRVlZZ8SAhwuE/b2u4+
fY+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530VbzDoQ7dOOkOCvXajz0FxEJzpSz4j0QRTrF/tCt49cst8mkne
wXx3zPnO8fDx8+u8j9QSx310C1nuOtpohu1vndBp+Bc7ym9GqQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxutpRPKa11zu9c+W9E5DpXqL82IQiqMl1uAnoxs5PpmuJ4axAElOx+ewd2a9dmr4TNGMsNXZTgDVedDvHwV+Y=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:3ff1:: with SMTP id w46mr435258qth.83.1606156484891;
Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:34:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <dcc265f9-a143-5093-eba0-94ee059c7cc7@mtcc.com>
<20201122021417.B5E6E27B3E59@ary.qy>
<CABuGu1pX=5ZC4RLsv19qrosRN9nCrPdeSk5Xg4O7ViEZit6dnA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAMSGcLCzN5q_p_TtUqv5CvwC0ZTkAY9eFaT_za-1WJXgRUmF4A@mail.gmail.com>
<CAHej_8nN+827KB+tTuyoeZXoUaKzcYoeizNmwSY-fKTquroPMA@mail.gmail.com>
<e3d428f4-1a29-4c6f-4a31-96a24a347e54@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e3d428f4-1a29-4c6f-4a31-96a24a347e54@gmail.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 13:34:28 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHej_8kGa7jicMg1dNaZ1TnL3C7_HzvBHEykcnAxKPACcC0Qpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc6fee05b4ca72fe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/J8GnVxaXl7-Ko80_HHZkySiKoko>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting,
and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>,
<mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:34:48 -0000
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:02 PM Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/23/2020 7:38 AM, Todd Herr wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 9:50 AM Joseph Brennan <brennan@columbia.edu> > wrote: > On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 7:14 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> This also means that ARC isn't useful if you don't have a reputation >>>> system to tell you where the lists and other forwarders that might add >>>> legit ARC signatures are. >>>> >>> >> And if you know which hosts are legit mailing lists or forwarders, you >> already know what ARC would tell you. >> > > I believe, though, that the intent of ARC is that it be scalable in ways > that manual enumeration of known legit mailing lists and forwarders is not. > > > "if you know which hosts are legit" buries an assumption that is > problematic, namely that you know who handled the message. The fack that a > message purports to be handled by a mailing list you trust does not mean it > actually was. > > That's the issue that ARC resolves. > > ARC (and DKIM) produce noise-free uses of identifiers. If the > authentication validates, the receiver knows is really was handled by who > is saying it was handled by. Without these, you don't. > > > Yes, but knowing it really was handled by who is saying it was handled by isn't the entirety of the problem. I can know from ARC headers that X handled the message and what email authentication checks X purports to have done when handling the message and what results X claims to have obtained. What I have to decide in that case is "do I trust X to record correct and valid results?" because the answer to that question will impact my disposition of the message when it reaches me. It's obviously not the place of the ARC protocol spec to proscribe how trust in ARC results can be determined, but without some system in place for assigning trust levels to ARC Sealers, ARC has limited utility for sites that serve as the terminal destination for a message. -- *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager *e:* todd.herr@valimail.com *p:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
- [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Douglas E. Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Joseph Brennan
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Doug Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Todd Herr
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Seth Blank
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Douglas Foster
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions Michael Thomas