Re: [dmarc-ietf] spec nit - which DKIM to report

[Дилян Палаузов <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

what is the purpose of the aggregate reports (rua)?

Regards
  Дилян

On Fri, 2019-06-21 at 12:06 -0700, Elizabeth Zwicky wrote:
> I believe they MUST contain any aligned DKIM signature regardless of validity and SHOULD  contain an entry for each domain, selector, result triple. 
> 
> Elizabeth 
> 
> > On Jun 21, 2019, at 11:46 AM, John Levine <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > 
> > In article <[e-mail]> you write:
> > > As mentioned by Elizabeth recently:  (Elizabeth please chime in if this 
> > > doesn't capture your meaning)
> > > 
> > > the spec does not define *which* DKIM signature should be reported in 
> > > the DMARC RUA created by a receiver.  The proposed resolution to this is 
> > > that if the receiver does not provide the complete set of DKIM 
> > > signatures found, they should provide (in order of preference)
> > > 1. a signature which passed DKIM in strict alignment with the From: 
> > > header domain
> > > 2. a signature which passed DKIM in relaxed alignment with the From: 
> > > header domain
> > > 3. some other signature that passed DKIM
> > > 4. some other signature that didn't pass DKIM
> > 
> > This seeems overcomplex.  How about saying the reports SHOULD include
> > all valid DKIM reports.  If they can't, they can't, and I don't see
> > any benefit in offering advice on how not to comply.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc