IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation

Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org> Fri, 02 August 2019 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A10120662 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (4096-bit key) header.d=aegee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njVw7HoNxKBQ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.aegee.org (mail.aegee.org [144.76.142.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD73F120659 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 09:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x72G0Bh9024373; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=didopalauzov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=aegee.org; s=k4096; t=1564761612; i=dkim+MSA-tls@aegee.org; r=y; bh=2n86Bt+6a4dKgvzwq4qAYTmbhW4UYzcMjonJCirwO9M=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; b=ev0sMFYHqSUfKgWFkCt3Q5optdqWi6xSvDgiMvHVSaxULQTwbLVa7HUnPDswMI9zf 2pLkx4LWKTe+VcgOYSnUsaS3lzYZJWLSUCk/3tndhLBUUmDtGgLX4J0AMI9yYzS5H8 wlmXHOWuULUuCsCY/rHYSQIi3XZ8aPpw+Y+SmiJiNveytSRduprQOU9wuriuzDwqgf BRyc7mbhDOv5xIXzevVhoah7B6AkamvYDGpNEfz5Y2mw4g8KxV7vBb+zmIOG4Gy1dr 8+OAry8pnVN8VI3Rf0jPOvhUSh515YZArKQZMQbM1Yfceod4/m3kxoE+XZTiULi4CW 6WHTk3FZKAtvFwnYSaKjQO5Xd0IROnJy/1rIbuF4Nl4jrIPOhyen3krm+eNrAM/rX+ QSim5I4HzVA/AGCebwrMrXZgH+ZjVaKwI12Q1DpyV361D9oY3Ty8jFuFiroDJdy+7M kyzDqLkeM0qhGAW6wGIexH/ZAEFWDkoR24UNE7SDHVeGzEhz3T3BlZs/z0j6xt8QeY lSp1JO5DRaQEvY5JQ2AoR+5j/dJ4SnQFmPz3lT6GjB1OyU+6/AlBsD5+jymx2DdX0H /vWqoy+MdCKb+ki+ZUgbs6Qv3R2h1ShHuB6whM3iI8M9T5BpHefg61CbaTTqV3bEYw 9ak0qWu53BNR1cFiUd1u94gs=
Authentication-Results: mail.aegee.org/x72G0Bh9024373; dkim=none
Received: from Tylan (87-118-146-153.ip.btc-net.bg [87.118.146.153]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.aegee.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x72G0Bh9024373 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:00:12 GMT
Message-ID: <c676b42745c2c8114ec26eb1f405c9eb2e68c364.camel@aegee.org>
From: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
To: dmarc <dmarc@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:00:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.33.90
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.2 at mail.aegee.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/JyvcOgcAdgvdowoVeZa5TjdcHoM>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:00:18 -0000

Hello,

why sites do not sent failure reports?

Will a site, not sending failure report, be willing to use an Enhanced Status Code, to signal, that the DKIM/SPF
implementations of the receiver and sender disagree?

* * * New Enhanced Status Code for Failed DMARC Validation

Code: X.7.30
Assocaited basic status code: Any
Description:  Used as partial substitution to failure reports, when DMARC validation fails.  250 2.7.30 means, that the
message was delivered, ordinary or as junk, despite failed DMARC validation. 550 5.7.30 is used when the message is
rejected, because the DMARC validation failed.  This status code is only usefull, when the receiving site does not send
failure reports.

Regards
  Дилян

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email