Re: [dmarc-ietf] Extensions in Aggregate Reporting - Feedback Requested

[Matthäus Wander <[e-mail]>]

Alessandro Vesely wrote on 2021-06-04 11:26:
> Second, I'm not sure we need an <extensions> container.  
> I'd go for an example like, say, so:
> 
> [...]
>     <extension_metadata name="bimi" 
> xmlns="http://ietf.org/xml-namesapaces/bimi-xml?/1.0">
 > [...]
>        <extension name="bimi" 
> xmlns="http://ietf.org/xml-namesapaces/bimi-xml??/1.0">

If we use an attribute for the extension name, then we don't the 
container section.
As the current schema does not use attributes at all, I'm more inclined 
to define the extension name in a different way for consistent non-use 
of attributes. But that's a minor detail.

>> 1) Extensions in their own section (as it is now) or within each <row> 
>> element
> 
> 
> Both, and both optional.  An extension can have some data to add in some 
> <record>, but not necessarily in all of them.

+1

Regards,
Matt