Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Tue, 10 December 2019 02:27 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03C412002F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:27:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xeShq67CStff for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:27:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E711A12001A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:26:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id u16so14709828ilg.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:26:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FBEhbm3+F06CZzminPTzbazle6AF+lxsCLtiV3g5sIs=; b=YuRQfIfcr7DkYo4qrAW7koWGjNb0GOBMrEeKxm/1IowtrzjmxpsvAgw6y8uzKz3/k0 Dav3EkIkA64samve+0+u49QZE+z0G0oR3Ks6y6OD864TWFMZX7J6U3AJoWWOGH+qkzM8 Lmh/MYGfgjCIqHyVfVoummnKWNP8dHp7stneU=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FBEhbm3+F06CZzminPTzbazle6AF+lxsCLtiV3g5sIs=; b=jQd4MrP/YEruDAnSDCQqoh3mQxdINomH4ODx73+PreGoU+j8XILDL06DlYo2l5ZnNK MmB60hmLvuDklvMog4WKFZkB2WwkG5jrFC+JI9UebpJdD8/dsTWWp9FiXVf1om6J3v9I 5MRU+kUFqhcexJoOuyi0e8oFoxmnWtiXJ9zw/nMh32w15CkLgQ/7AzEbu+ZYV8UUl5rL lkgv6pljZwr8SRG2TObzgJM8Qj1yCLPcEGk5f0psBntTvBNgZPx32Qs4Wzq6PG9rPtJ/ pt+g/FES2u8EU1UW60hC7FxvLBpcHAt+L8NSWqJURK3fuUnEczuPX1O055JQIscyLFWR wLAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYlb6EpUu6dwlBYDWJGb/VUMWhor//184nxq0AVdkcQg29wHu6 aIoYGip/lbKG8Mt7PuCX7zgmBfFfvDNvJvnuPFs4qLhH6Nw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwjmpgCV4o0nwkYxXm2QdgZgfskRj2oxdjipqPXwzi+S7G9OpVVb7l9g2vxqZyU3JogHw6wvEyjThBZNcEDxR0=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:360b:: with SMTP id d11mr31819769ila.23.1575944819030; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 18:26:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <082f2102-693c-136d-874c-1182f12a6818@gmail.com> <CABa8R6vV3=mONXUehda_6C616CyEXPRjceSN8T+DcPmLQwcXOA@mail.gmail.com> <92703458.QmNNAb80T6@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <92703458.QmNNAb80T6@l5580>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:26:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ob6CYTt7_X1pMfGpajMOoytN3wuX_i+9MQf9nUYkzk0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001fda8b0599503fa8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/KryM3V7T-Qh8TrRu-FVE-GH9ydA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 02:27:02 -0000

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 4:54 PM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>; wrote:

> On Monday, December 9, 2019 7:41:27 PM EST Brandon Long wrote:
>
> > I'm sure I probably missed this, but couldn't we avoid this question by
> just mandating no reporting for non-existing organizational domains?  Is
> that a non-starter?
>
> It's one of the use cases we are trying to cover.  I don't know if that
> makes it a non-starter.
>

Unless I'm misunderstanding Brandon's suggestion, it seems like you
(Brandon) are asking if doing no reporting on missing org domains solves
the scalability problem. *Getting* reports for missing org domains is the
main purpose of the PSD proposal so it would render the purpose moot.

--Kurt