IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-03.txt

Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com> Thu, 19 August 2021 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <todd.herr@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6932F3A19B4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xTeuRg6V-D8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 040703A19B3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id 22so8423414qkg.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DPbasc5Ftr0JntNY1+hJM4AS/3KubnRJVMk5Cbu7P/w=; b=Oafm9m7dKXOuvNjoCH/rPDMzlPMNmdnWf1cJQ7d2x/aB30pX27ZwLDVYUxn2xb7f8Z gqKyLTGq0K4UXgj7V7QihyuIG8WuDh8+Eu2X1pN2g9LtrF4tLYEZoYTqXFYB+qUmX8Z2 muryrgloi6ph+pXNey6z2irjdBUS8eCWeHjh5vrOVx9IGwAOZE5j/pTZpd7LagW4DMQz FuzCeSZ6aggPYKGHQrCZTwjXBu2OuHB42+R5Wgms782caowds02IJSJzwvh5qT8N5ii9 w6hczRDkqjHO1N9tPYbtNoI9l31cqzmecm3gZO5jGC4xL0FIdAdb0yvoKY/DU6T008qh uM8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DPbasc5Ftr0JntNY1+hJM4AS/3KubnRJVMk5Cbu7P/w=; b=R2ZEcvyYhJPT2QcbDLTcQRuKsFdvPViMF85ebLynUYQ9AoDzTZtQlHGj1tnXk69P2I c5dG3nSqn/8D/tm/dt3dk3LNoSXrWrFSX3rjTNtaH8OrydZbitrZGc0kAHc7/89BvrQA t2V4mx6c80U1mFxiEjpZV34/RjpP4vohBsDq82R+so8sMB44NnlbaQi40N5HlzHJfQIh KH+hQWHEXxAvVIGJ1S2w19rwB2CO54XaNnq0CcQCtqzq2GzTp7PN4kqfL6Jyo4Ymx/zj 9yt7FezvUrLa+yzq1aSPWLXdjDz407edufAsfEqOMQeFRzatEcbtMjNjx9PwcFa4Xhf1 w6Gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533X9VhAYVSxMCcOGIUOIApncWX+O1cxV664shQE2oIEXNY+0LRp dzn9D6iLQRzJQ3GWBiX8UBFnDa3oEC71Suk1m3Q6TA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyro4n/8txyLlzG41P09SFh2Wy2t9OHa8MkQx85vmUQl9zcC/l9lyNaP1aU8ODcDSXSxOlbQffq9pdsA0CYVxs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:171e:: with SMTP id az30mr5447215qkb.325.1629401842755; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162931752865.27585.10197515584988072678@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHej_8mcwKcjwxV09_6ENrOnh5t+seDv_kTZiO0mgyRS2BVgTA@mail.gmail.com> <3e4b2087-a866-6f66-3964-71a3c67eab8b@tana.it> <CAHej_8kVW8daPQhghouneRS37WhaCHo4Os6Ggd43FbOpo=ri6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZjou+Qtr1JHjCmV+jAk1FqicB+zG4KTiRHZOLRHLV5Ng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZjou+Qtr1JHjCmV+jAk1FqicB+zG4KTiRHZOLRHLV5Ng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Todd Herr <todd.herr@valimail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:37:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHej_8mzm_w9S282FxHg3saMtU1i_O_69VWz9veDHNrbkA2U3w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000008c01705c9eeae6b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/LAG9jGxIBa9Wf9H6EOI5o_gQvTc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 19:37:32 -0000

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 3:22 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> I agree the parsers won't break from this change, but an operator
> currently advertising "pct=33" will suddenly stop getting what it thought
> it was asking for.  One could argue that this constitutes "breakage".
>
>
It has been argued by some that an operator currently advertising "pct=33"
(or anything other than 0 or 100) was never getting what it thought it was
asking for in the first place, hence the discussion about removing the pct
tag.


-- 

*Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email