Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A143A1605 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:41:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.751
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MoENN3diEsug for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CC763A1604 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id b8so11397063plh.12 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:41:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=xF2efYthROIsDCbl+Z6BeXs50cD7c2S9LwwSe4kW/aw=; b=lvMCUScWgRMUTmMBzoxmhKS1aIj7i1Fpj7NrzpP4t1v7PFfTzSOiA/pKyxvRm6Pj/5 yz512d2KKaxUktN5ning3USz7oA5VFY+7IoMUEZ02YMO31r/BIvCgS5xSW8iQUcwpZhu bXxstsg2f0ZTNvFxUDUPMM0IG/zEgLUJhiz2thxRxQHYUUQoHcQFPj/73+G11y8Ypvv+ iu7KJb/b+geqwPTUBOU4urb0eYN75GaUuTEjqHKVWGKbBEvka5IC63TyE1ymZPWrPVsp 1TRoQk5oBFNV05C87egxrhX69/fgdwBuTdD6N/pS+M5uDFsOqyrkSQiHOtt59QjGprFA ZFKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=xF2efYthROIsDCbl+Z6BeXs50cD7c2S9LwwSe4kW/aw=; b=X5jb2gOTuWdd8AHuKW1GdrGKPn0sze0ls6uBYUv+MLNEfhl/4XxKNE5d0T9uAnJyiS eKnsyrLYIqJABoEm3TRCkwQvInKNvLLcJvqRlV8J7NLfhoXwuGHroUsDKGDoxDBZ86cf QYQL21b7RDq9t+KPl0LMQS96T67EmmDv8st3ujZ8Elo7lNfMdAwOAm7cLqLj5+jQyevg b3F/m8YGonWGt8pMyPNufmMZcDUCRfVIX54q09DBrcrut0QpZ+pVeXS2jNg169MkMK+7 84+NuFHdTOLwsjFxLB9WnGWeFBTPvV1PtcpfEg+qMpGEi0FtfaSacFkjUd4CMQAA56ji 74JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lH7tbOCD24UMzgHcNKL0QQXtWYDSQh4qDm6oInOknxPwLRScO MQZZWpD3QuFprIGRsq6ZEUd0InDwXCixng==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7v/R75NbItAy90AKwJ+I039CKCzQkobz+hcF5/XUGteEXZhB4fGX6SGRk3fzprEntdBDC/A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:206:: with SMTP id c6mr1521595pjc.50.1612226482158; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:41:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-37-188.volcanocom.com. [107.182.37.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm20264311pgl.31.2021.02.01.16.41.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:41:21 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20210201232105.1931D6D20971@ary.qy> <41163cd5-be81-6fd7-07dd-7a474874429e@gmail.com> <044c4a55-facb-9053-1ae9-0b8d87c7ca3a@mtcc.com> <CAJ4XoYeHxhZyAsMBJfjDn7XFSeFt39agjoFQRBTbMZ0zdvaLyg@mail.gmail.com> <38f5c417-3c7d-72c9-2590-391c07226164@mtcc.com> <16430b47-2496-b461-e292-ea6a7d945e71@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <0c02a7f2-6078-5821-332f-5bd169a0b358@mtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:41:19 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <16430b47-2496-b461-e292-ea6a7d945e71@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/M0uQQdATklhXNEbJPK0rZNFqbko>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Forensic report loops are a problem
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 00:41:25 -0000

On 2/1/21 4:16 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 2/1/2021 4:12 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> So we're supposed to ignore security considerations because... some 
>> companies are a mess?
>
>
> we're supposed to balance purported security considerations with 
> pragmatic, real-world operational limits.
>
> cost/benefit.  not an unusual concept.
>
We have no means of evaluating what you're complaining about. It's a 
Chimera, and a long tailed one at that.

Mike