IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE7212012D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gw5FvwpBEr_j for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E79120224 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id v18so85774932ljh.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mUU6rYMrNzQ43OMQDg0nLGtJmG/ikU5w/NdZe4ESbCE=; b=t3OV4htz9vmazh+A5XMZ8aVihrBve+BRijB0XP8PChpd1p5rdbOPSDk83aj8h4w591 N3CfC1QOffy3DlUeqwHc1txxWYDp7hfZBuj05JbO9A4rhZKsv0rYYlJih1xSFa7GNo5T z+MnywehNx+25s6NbsCRI1wnI7BCApnZmgnprBdpvJWg8/FC9zObKJ8kdKTZDp13xgrV Vmi+QlcWhue3s+hnpmBuwmdX07UmAk8lxvtiVVsp62yMBniunM1Ww8S1Wv4rUqR3sLIV s8lBvN6fPJBtajm2ZMWnt+rcbvrXXvQmSr6y6jaNKSZaT0x9gtRwOWv9KI4rBcNVTTsy s6XA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mUU6rYMrNzQ43OMQDg0nLGtJmG/ikU5w/NdZe4ESbCE=; b=EXWHM6WbVftkLpkWAm/Zh24TeRy7OOj82oiUyWquDJ/muDSTi/SAFp8/DLF6orwN6K mEEe6DDAyTZxSujQ2bYoXj202oHMd1Ll9FoVvD5yZEUdxVqfdRm7gUVhIl37U95Bk2Ea Qtn7CMEWWJ6Zep/m9RR0I9dDlqtHN8RCJJmGbgB4u948Pgjg2B0AM9RJO1iGv25VsQmh PVkY5yd0SFnapVhCFJ0zK8ObZvP6xFIPRv7dQCRySjBxDMjC++D+I99qbMwwKIKQ067c qdF4yGldNQJb66OCFsEpOUvDmX+C796jpcgAY6t8ZLfIHBzd1OHQ1lnr291/KvYXFlUg 69Yw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXYPtnpzkB0LlK1QLBOnMC4VCPFHnk7BHmRcE1DhF4OD+G4vdJw nBlrIoVJig+mGJeTNrlVBXYz4B/X87Ugfk9gFwsjHQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyUdYGJfcpO5QE7yVNjsWXvN4SvJCQRgIyvpdcyNjU5Qklorx00+QCn3KufieJ/Q+u7TN2iN4yylaEAIGAGzZ0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7c14:: with SMTP id x20mr3105615ljc.56.1565190875239; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e580ada3-d9b5-0e5b-9ac3-eade41ac92d2@tana.it> <CAL0qLwa5yR5dVzkDSD48MDgpUa11+ri=KOwrNSqOxi8fB2i6PA@mail.gmail.com> <eabefc6b-7542-1a46-4272-b786433ed0b5@tana.it> <4783309.BXR8ZdE9c3@l5580> <CAL0qLwb5FAaYZ7AX_H=aeUFkv8cvY+xd1bQ5uCDp4tmrbx2CQg@mail.gmail.com> <7a21b80b-e6bb-d8b9-cf63-601a8d1e47e7@tana.it> <C1E711A8-F3A6-4A20-B71D-53FA773A61D9@kitterman.com> <aca25d30-3b01-4eaf-6d0b-3bae6f3f796b@tana.it> <CAL0qLwaY=YPskxLwZXkm9Gj4yvYEdJTMBSECOxvg6B4+Xb4EJA@mail.gmail.com> <a2bcc8a6-8fe6-54b8-5134-f1c51f74a35d@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <a2bcc8a6-8fe6-54b8-5134-f1c51f74a35d@tana.it>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:14:22 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwa2LAQsCNRtN-dS9oxmTDRyEQNDiQtyWTDCWh_NkMVdvQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001fda0d058f886670"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/MkmJDjEbY5CLOmTUXEvcWPAx-kQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Do is need a new ptype? Was Re: New authentication method, DNSWL
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:14:39 -0000

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 8:28 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> IOW, dnswl=pass means the sender was whitelisted.
>

If that's the case, why do downstream agents need "policy.ip" at all?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email