Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513EC1205F6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:55:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_NO_HELO_DNS=1.295, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YPcHhV1p9k2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2b.google.com (mail-io1-xd2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2688F1200F3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2b.google.com with SMTP id k20so22137357ios.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Cinwa9/iNa9F6NiiFHObj/nNSrOfGTt/CUTor6garGs=; b=PokQREbG+oOaaoirDSqBUdQNtpsOINpDRJuAsLkePmhswb0jhw7++eYiO89eFk0QjT DH0+0ep4cBHz/Vb/1x21gKoUSQQBUx0CcnYTO8TwUO5RstYOO3z8eNZbxsSDO8qRhRkp jF3R0cWyUXeyn9GqY6Y/3cSenT4Vz9r5gisaw=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cinwa9/iNa9F6NiiFHObj/nNSrOfGTt/CUTor6garGs=; b=daRzcuMcUV9TrdAHTCKPuDlS6si1UBk/pxluO13qFyxl8F+iWTA+o5VqLUe/81rhmp Qa8Khpe7MGxU7RYfxSJiJqWgfQ00OP4eP/YSNfnJvzQlS4II/dwD+C8nlb5J1+ZPy8N4 FDTNvto9mueEopfoqrqiq658HPfopKOQkrwfQHc5MggUX/gAZpWTYOqgxwFsGfVJ7u+F ADqiYfawr/qc71qZbjV6u1B+cuKjNxhxQBjIVc6rGJ/4phcpWtcAuZEbF6bh3cXDs3/D bq3FVNIi7Jo8/A4JWGVxhe3xfl2X3jSRoae28etQkUlPlxn051ExYU7Iw2X4frLZdSD8 p6ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUROG8ketsOm084q3UCUZi68f3JSE6pATTCo+3+F9vS2pGfALB3 fDCDXx7mPOWQxz7enk2Exe2t9U2wAq4xB2/R4BsKG/IH
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJ//+RRA73F0aOlmrgxpv2FORxRuoi4g6uyZuwdowjQMkwMOgNjb5hsjhpSAZuA7CCBH83o0Cr21eh9osX/b4=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:948a:: with SMTP id v10mr8066721ioj.103.1562954109715; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAL0qLwbbz_UhBLsURg=eXhRBC2g9OghiN==T9Uq9pFuLtd=b7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOZAAfN0+nxpN1P_nk3y5f8MTQ=c7DYNvYic2iDMuCK_bNa=qg@mail.gmail.com> <1893230.9INSBCnb99@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <1893230.9INSBCnb99@l5580>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:54:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1rCF1C1rK9PpbEiDmP+85FvgB_aSuvieGL=hRcrFGXNBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082ebf7058d7f9c88"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NI2STHc4dM8PCjqZaSHuaBtj-hU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nonexistent Domain Policy was: Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:55:14 -0000

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:50 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>;
wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:21:14 PM EDT Seth Blank wrote:
>
> > 3. If an np= tag is needed to allow PSD functioning for only NXDOMAINs
>
> The limited feedback during WGLC has been favorable to this.
>
> This will require a rather larger change to the document than the other
> issues, but they are manageable and I believe I have most of the relevant
> text
> from earlier revisions.
>
> I think we should include this.
>

I am much more concerned with adding another tag that can only be used in a
PSD-DMARC record. I would be much more open to make a "normative" change to
the DMARC tag list (RFC 7489 section 11.4) to define np for any DMARC
record, than to make this a special case for PSD-DMARC records.

--Kurt