Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A943A0D71 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:13:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BucstD11dnqY for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:13:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D0293A0D6B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:13:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id l12so848240oil.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:13:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=iD/IbtAwMmmJkz4xLxGzypxRtLXqzF+iIzEmudzI2dU=; b=iRAvz3v1AgkSY7bPyMSl9IwQU0fKhvxVUQnUoALuBXHQomFnhrOkAleehDyNCq4Roe aWo9pcwVTlbV8L7OgILrfqbRrn2d+fkY1xTaG5qg24i2d6JeiL+VMFVqMzm0UCtz5CQy rnQMvO7eRCF7eHTR3Rwp4TDtj8P1aqW7b9E5vEpmTIQ7IDLb7vILLzwIqr2INf0QmcyJ CIxQ3nbgC/Q4x2P9KvbkoR6H2OjHmEQqrUlMjdBNv7b+R8V9FdgffozY3cxIUSakLEut yHsPhREF2A8uAEEyZHoTh8jLHlxWJ9XcIwWy0dqsu2mWV6utJcVi2xUUL+OT06SsD7rS qZpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=iD/IbtAwMmmJkz4xLxGzypxRtLXqzF+iIzEmudzI2dU=; b=WFvgaZdbRUUqnzh5jc6AhZ7ivGNhXaYXI3taoMxr7yvv8zYWQHZCITlr/xAHazdQM0 8TKFnn3GhT4TY94cMLn2IvHv5hHiDppYI6sVIW7zqk1V4RhXCp86b2cKLdKBfiuM25vO dNPhZ4I04C2Jn29lCWIuShSGkpSIBtSdPnPgEKjnHLJEmBgKqgoURKFPazhwmV0wE4ol AsMmCh94vVIFdXuNZ3PHbWIIUqZd5YBCkTOIICSQ2HFjby33wU1RcEpfpJxpWk+jNyCw 0tn1gQ31A6TS7G3VN+W2+o51JRlDjzyCf5Zdyn95IUKP6hrd8HGgtRxxzPzpJoq09PFo 6iMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUPzEE8AfJcKbb0w9K6aXjJtRHS2OuqWwFIFdo93gg7FatsILKJ nASuP/YyeaaeOoSbc8i3sLuKAeIdxM4TZGU7SYX7fA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHeq3nxQLyoHVLBFQKJuQ6cENJvXvQcsxT8tmaA0GBMCUMYwMLLYpmzDk8rMgWizLVQ0Gw33WfpU7J3SF24qQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:a8e:: with SMTP id q14mr854100oij.173.1582841632388; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:13:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbp2hNrgF_xxhKRRODQ6HP=U5_K-r3Wtm1wJZOZcKup3g@mail.gmail.com> <9DE9E7DC-FE60-4952-8595-B2D087A6B780@kitterman.com> <CADyWQ+GSP0K=Ci22ouE6AvdqCDGgUAg3jZHBOg3EwCmw=QG84A@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1obn55Y2=CuEYRYCEO3TYYNhYTsdkesQ67O61jRyfO=wA@mail.gmail.com> <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad89a@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwZnomZJTbFB=dfFdw2vWg7B0ObRuoage3pcWaYmP9Kp4A@mail.gmail.com> <082f2102-693c-136d-874c-1182f12a6818@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZjd2qhejctNK0BM7j=SscaE45Mm7U9iWJNvO-GuhEKQA@mail.gmail.com> <1aa141c4-50d8-4f2e-c72f-e1d0bf19f280@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY-v-VS-Wai-aqGRPOj1i8HxqMrYybzsNJGzN2dTHvG9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ+U=1qw63VGCEXAqA7AhL_GpidwcWBuLV-aAeJgvcTagi8=dA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZobYEj7nmj0B5vHH5ED+BBv2uocGPVRSN-S0-xFzL68w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ+U=1o4qchsgm9ei3=WuW5qWOPOzdY8ox83rM23b1UZLc=Z0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZaNS-J5WSAmqh1DcwNKNXFo+9udt_SiUUqWNdVFxCnOw@mail.gmail.com> <281fcc15-049c-b586-8514-0322cd0578c6@tana.it> <CABuGu1q5c5jte7k-9YRCG=Oy0wzyjd+ZD4t9+iMJ5CBiY+OokA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1q5c5jte7k-9YRCG=Oy0wzyjd+ZD4t9+iMJ5CBiY+OokA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:13:41 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+HXbteCG5BpHoVqHbiu3RdSLPrsqBFmQFfZmUPJF4VUcg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003bf93a059f9609ec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/NLcEY-QpItsgvHfp2q-0oCPOjOg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:13:55 -0000

Informational works for me if that helps moves things forward.

I also agree with Mr. Crocker's thesis on teasing about the PSL from DMARC,
but that should not hinder forward progress on PSD.

tim




On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:50 PM Kurt Andersen (b) <kboth@drkurt.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:16 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>
>> On Thu 27/Feb/2020 06:30:59 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> >
>> > With a completed (and now seven month old) Working Group Last Call on
>> the
>> > PSD document, and as far as I can see no sustained objection, we should
>> > proceed toward publication.
>>
>> Great!
>>
>
> +1
>
> > I will put this question to the working group: Can we solve this problem
>> by
>> > switching the document to Informational status, and can the working
>> group
>> > accept that outcome?
>>
>> If publishing as experimental would further delay publication, I'd accept
>> informational.
>>
>
> Also agree.
>
> --Kurt
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>