IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CD9120336 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wb7zHTt0dDh8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x230.google.com (mail-lj1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC53120325 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x230.google.com with SMTP id p17so85855510ljg.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hBmBzwuTyYmzlfirBEdTAg01cgWC61Px+WUD8pWcK98=; b=WChJJyO5tPDbn2CGKMDV+mhXNMEd4+05Kp3Z/B+/ajcr2lUXvCR1fdrqFUotisTond RjhT6wlQaLC0FGD8e++rwPADCR6w6FyI02egtaTvZtBGTaGnpTU6GhCV3Zr0ecvS/jCU qaHZydJZ7BhwZpHAPDTpn125oxSosQcn6ECpOFGdiGOLMkSCPYtHzEVPeQimsaTvY+We WlOdA4IP/m/Pl0BP4Aws/Dp2mVPVzjObcmbaj3b9dZ+43kmC0Z2UEjhVovLUJ3cP3fcQ Up0IiKgaiS/OXJeSe2yItDgCGQL8iTIDp9lDQ2Wt1EQKz/DXCyakSV1ePeCmKLhGd3c7 FWNg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hBmBzwuTyYmzlfirBEdTAg01cgWC61Px+WUD8pWcK98=; b=q3FYo/kKqa56B4kGhGlO1BT2L+HZysTQyiyttLeCYisyqsZi8GzNtnJYbSteEczYQm R+K0SvAC2UHyVUrq8UNKWH9LlHPN6znWJNgF+9m6Qdkry3liMPV+27Ly8JTqkKSIpKCQ E3d9d7iEqlUJY4qZCP26tnLWvg0NwHI9thzS49/p0e6XBCK8pZtiftyIG+1g8LIgn5A9 D4Y3ZD4hCzLJReYseCPUcbaZfjscM7pCYe4t9VlKe2kYYu9ZYFRfqpDINL2Y2arBmzEK DSc05LxTXkfphBddK5emLlwmR0XD+jSUiTu+8S43ms4lzMEn5SBVmb011cF3fCZ24/zV Vq4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzs7fe0QwmkTultXEQBIiU7W+Fu1xJAeulHo5FIXDkrmDSJHZd 7PHlBWBNlOiTS4lbPptPzOFDkSBi1MuE7x2JHJKyGQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOFbkHVjWAxOFBxDY1HCA9csxI4CIPcXunudjgoz+SgPkkRwZLlwj3ohCnz57eSxqAmh13r6ol2nLXvz2OO3U=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:988b:: with SMTP id b11mr5175921ljj.110.1565190812955; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190803030532.1D33375D900@ary.qy> <ca1b774878b68db5a88f5369fa3e70f2799b7afe.camel@aegee.org> <0CB7D475-6DDE-403D-BA65-E38C89A6D90A@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <0CB7D475-6DDE-403D-BA65-E38C89A6D90A@kitterman.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 08:13:18 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZHryj+KgzTsy+mi227c1N5i=dKXa9-6cXB12sU_2EvHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000069787f058f886252"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/OSxo48mfoxpXzcqC6A7GmXId-64>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] New proposed wording for p=quarantiine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 15:13:37 -0000

On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:02 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> Policy is an indication of sender preference, not a directive the receiver
> must follow.  I think the definition is fine.  If the sender prefers
> failing messages be quarantined, then they should use that policy.  They
> won't get what they want in all cases and that's fine.
>

This matches my understanding.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email