Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 10 February 2021 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686583A0FEF for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:49:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvGyTkrPUX-r for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:49:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D3A03A0FEB for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u4so3726465ljh.6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:49:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DynI/QwkfbZoKGz7WLaHi7J3p0E8bxAi6cyUQhozYHQ=; b=ValZlRUhK+O3+TDKvrBqlp/zpmyKsV9ikIqicp1uaTdlG7O+Gr6oeTVZ9HBGtPMoTn iefMNvI2rTyqmEcM6ctxFGTKJ/GnbHmbrMCHa4wWhHJdjaAwZkDbSTHo4PAjgjZAKNIf WezEkzMJN0503SFRjp9LfhQTZv5H14KHfNxsc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DynI/QwkfbZoKGz7WLaHi7J3p0E8bxAi6cyUQhozYHQ=; b=NvbnftZTlMxZ9zhhETi4oyZwAGum8HR7v/fvPW3Ejfc/L0I/fysMDomoMngfEY4iRF 1g6OR6f6cJErXyItFUnCbj5+zGkPpMuRwZTmirHvPCJFSVUxoKjTgs408bHgLu3x8C5f KtAi5gDQnESZswhz6z0nNy3X1tF5CXDNexmoKxo51V0Nybm7lwgkreIc7iMegbWtJntB ZP/oy6L5S7nIolK/LOUSDYlksXSM40Y8D+XLe/XUZfJqJmuMsHlCAXFXksUzf4EN8vCc 0m8mJ03OLs17eEqR4boWMuUTvhgawb54h3a9P/y97La8Yqg9vzN6Pq5Ghq0u32VgBhh8 Fmdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kN9MGSUZwYnMR5Iwe8R1LLfyhU2Lt4dp36n5yYpypAyA5IKuU 1sszTEk9zUkAkaoP1Q2E/B1+BXgHHhoixW0BWKsBBQA1keS6Lg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyt8QQF/niIVFkJrdU38dK7igUDwrqGKdHF6Z7XDwJKd3TdHmtvnF1CZXwNGsgKSvKAFm3DrelUt4a4hfxITJw=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88b:: with SMTP id r11mr2503770ljp.187.1612975769521; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:49:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210203181226.9AB746D51182@ary.qy> <CAHej_8k6DA8140QB2buaRCaJfc0U9fVSC=nSAu-dWsZshCRX_Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfxFsQ5ntE05QYRqP5P3Na6vuDjNAQKAdjZe7Kvt7evKuw@mail.gmail.com> <2285569.RditZUVBbg@zini-1880> <ea27d175-e436-fa40-0571-da1e0189d488@tana.it> <2244314.3GJdnAqG3q@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <2244314.3GJdnAqG3q@zini-1880>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:49:17 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1q_jLsGP5c74_vc_SnQoozxOipaFzJ6RmeMR7jy0Vk=Xg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c628a705bafe2f43"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/OSzTD2lz4PC5qV3Xjb0A_0_JXEs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #1 - SPF alignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:49:33 -0000

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 6:43 AM Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
wrote:

> No.  Sigh.  Let's try it again.
>
> Yes, one might actually use a HELO result for DMARC.  It gives you the
> same
> result as if mail from is null.  So what?
>
> No one has given us a case where an attacker could get a aligned SPF
> result
> based on HELO that they couldn't also get with mail from, so it doesn't
> matter.
>
> By problem, I mean an actual problem.  There aren't any.
>
> Scott K
>

The other issue that people who are continuing this thread are ignoring is
that changing 7208 is out of scope for this WG.

--Kurt