Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Sat, 23 January 2021 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F533A0FD1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 03:20:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X3Ie_KYoyqc9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 03:20:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1013A0FD0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 03:20:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1611400852; bh=tK7ly/WzesLCMwAKCdi4vYk+eEyoO3ZpZVyzsBfXNF0=; l=500; h=To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=CogNPU7hSNYbmVDYLUJEET6zRsmJG97omdp3GEyy4rEBh4RaKiQktFVqISwNqoW1N 1ib7OYQ/tNoesmfC6WEGCMtyCMpBG1GavZa84uh4G0V1ICX3fh6cT6RZaxv0V63Qsy Ns2zn57IKrEFGL4NlzWqFRASWJVyVmy08S2z3uvTvliqrF20hdAyMmCOAKFhp
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
Original-From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.111] (pcale.tana [172.25.197.111]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0CF.00000000600C0694.00000312; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:20:52 +0100
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org, emgu@google.com
References: <20210122224018.E63E06BF246B@ary.qy>
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Message-ID: <3a6b6650-0276-d59b-54fa-5a3ec41a44a0@tana.it>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:20:50 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210122224018.E63E06BF246B@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/P7ON8LTfnDEVTNo9D3GXeWxioDs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reports helping spammers? (#81)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:20:57 -0000

On Fri 22/Jan/2021 23:40:18 +0100 John Levine wrote:
> 
> As someone said, the better the spammers align their stuff, the better
> we can filter it.


100% agreed.


> Close this, please.


Please don't.  That such a doubt can cross the minds even of knowledgeable 
people is a real issue.  At a minimum, the paragraph I cited[*] should be 
restored.  A crispy further clarification is welcome.

Best
Ale
-- 

[*] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/HRAR3hSdckw3mU_Gebh8vcYOjm4