Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes

Todd Herr <> Thu, 17 June 2021 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1740C3A2060 for <>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:44:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1NrxvKcGFjU3 for <>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF34A3A2044 for <>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id u30so3124317qke.7 for <>; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bYBjvGKOLzu4445joVG3CC6z65E6nN3ZTfVZ1FiQ0ME=; b=fTCr1LgoH3MP4I5YqAPOsRF6dGEmdDLioqVPoEfVFQNYTuR1or6/ZHLgyPylRNr6PV ew4l8s1j+p7zglRupiBdVfeYwkWEn24UzBRovZKXuDIKDmN/kpxaatAlJVJ/eB7/6nHY YeCKD12XqvAVf5BBG9dc5TbEb1yVa4fsUnVGSkaBB3xjjMC/y5ml8SSgfQtMJtleMLoC 78lqDd4d9Vnqoh/turjU3FtJDBqeoRKa71Z5e6ZoQuELZUKDLq2fJyDZe6cvy/OlgHJS A1hRcfurQOxqU7LvPBbwsYKSace2U1Av78fcy+W6FnN31UId6e1IAMhZjXdCjUyodLbf +Dww==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=bYBjvGKOLzu4445joVG3CC6z65E6nN3ZTfVZ1FiQ0ME=; b=GLZ/sv7jOH/8FqnGlL9J8zmbZ/5JITBqWqU1HTWrKmK/2u0vxlRVB+kWIYiiMCrK7Y xa3vFi/44PwsxYQ2lgI5gXtTHk20/l6lAUNQf4nFoXhw9ndVOo/xs+ytzl9BcYqJXLz3 QFdEReZbr8HwH9disBiXVW9dV+a0jGB6Ih7onT3aLuTFpnusSEpfnMIsYNS5CNLJmSwf 3DNvN2jAG+7bBGL/6+YyaSy0Y6CXEYCWb85YA4LJjxK8QqkWLkaMleJIZUKSiifwozvU f3n/1L+Hc2UvtrsXWYh6SEbNPY5038DcuDT82nHx/EKHNtnNG8F/DdpVhArEBYU/E8Rz a3Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Hh4jBPzY7d7Xt5VB41G5OZ2C5Im/K+8uFcAxme/8zcQru0o56 U/7OWmxkYg2P1+5ZbmFxuhpnolVruWPgQuIPnULUXZH8mSgBWg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw24/U9/72KINoPZIur9I0dnUc4Wha9PKJbpjQBCm4Jv02lGShhaGSNgUCx33VdvUv/Q4RjTLH7/YIeorSs2E0=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:b205:: with SMTP id b5mr3973616qkf.208.1623937438863; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 06:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Todd Herr <>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 09:43:43 -0400
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e667005c4f666ab"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:44:14 -0000

I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text
changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02,
which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance
to do so.

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:32 PM Steven M Jones <> wrote:

> On 5/28/21 08:47, Todd Herr wrote:
> Consensus on Ticket #82 <>
> (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC
> Interim to remove the "rf" tag from the core spec and allow for the
> possibility that it could potentially be reintroduced, if needed, in the
> separate failure reporting spec. (The fo tag was not discussed during this
> part of the Interim).
> I support moving the tag to either of the associated reporting documents,
> if it is included anywhere.
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list


*Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.