Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag)

I have closed the subject ticket and incorporated relevant text
changes in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-02,
which will be published on Datatracker as soon as the chairs have a chance
to do so.

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:32 PM Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> wrote:

> On 5/28/21 08:47, Todd Herr wrote:
>
>
> Consensus on Ticket #82 <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/82>
> (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) was reached during the May 27 DMARC
> Interim to remove the "rf" tag from the core spec and allow for the
> possibility that it could potentially be reintroduced, if needed, in the
> separate failure reporting spec. (The fo tag was not discussed during this
> part of the Interim).
>
>
> I support moving the tag to either of the associated reporting documents,
> if it is included anywhere.
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

-- 

*Todd Herr* | Technical Director, Standards and Ecosystem
*e:* todd.herr@valimail.com
*m:* 703.220.4153

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Consensus Sought - Ticket #82 (Deprecate rf= and maybe fo= tag) - With Interim Notes