Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reporting DMARC policy in A-R header fields

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Wed, 31 July 2019 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B0F1200D7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14hBVW0wZb1t for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D7D312004F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id o9so33387975iom.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LrTJ7RNuHTVj40eNd8DrjWVLlUtbm1g7I0F496pvTOs=; b=GiDkCl0quCZBaBLAoMpg24DA0PlyZ9eoUFLHLATnu2HiiB4ocmpfmu75vCwZZXNPhZ BzCljK2UKDfBWqDvhMxSbI8UX650ZuE2cIzhRxOstD/U9c/37QrFp/fY4JDmUv13BCZZ g3KbMe7SW5z/pS4HBXxM5TsFmIeq6Ax5F7GGI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LrTJ7RNuHTVj40eNd8DrjWVLlUtbm1g7I0F496pvTOs=; b=BqKblsBph6DwAA/nFVGaHSxwGrjXJfMg+N/vjIwSlPuf/jGoHxZqHhO5TMq0yGdhrF XbBbjNo/2l3dKvHT8qp9E7BFggM1n8OGKErMNDuEm2LViyhJX78Ro3S9gyQ3twqHexKE DtVDUkf2JbepIBOz6Z/cCPudRQIFvsLhlqJckjavCjlZIa01rxsE6LKE/qwfqFDU610p h0UAw1WkQroqQdK2iuwoi2hHCGvPeb4l88KKm6gx8hc8jwRJs4QzI+sG91uimmeNjRTs wLfq7c5ObFwpDL2p+Zuk1CdGp8HgDN3RDGExu8lQCD1E8DLifTr6jzwvmenIw5sAoN/c EKCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV0d9EqjQnLzeQuY3gKi8uAivMj8vCeFPnUPcf/425xQCLDtWtj uOT7hg5/5TucZbXxn2VPUscjiH9NTWHIyPgjyFFS8r6E
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxQk1sDPx1Ko1nur1VF7NaVJHNliwGqJtls9N4w51UhzKMvbS3ZQQJXzZAKf6J2TPb6FLcejdQLlMQIfrCQCtM=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5b01:: with SMTP id v1mr7944226ioh.120.1564585576364; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2577720.3ZthdXZjm2@l5580> <4600949.rz9u5RyGOV@l5580> <ad404895f272ede4a9d0fb7cfb142a65414318d3.camel@aegee.org> <60001A26-503E-4DB0-B164-2AADD47CFE06@kitterman.com> <a94b0dda-11ea-7342-d835-fb2cbe82d507@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <a94b0dda-11ea-7342-d835-fb2cbe82d507@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 08:06:03 -0700
Message-ID: <CABuGu1ovPGPWhoysc-m+8hXjpso8n-nELCQmwxraJdzFoWxfug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000801899058efb778d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/PV966Yjw5J6bYHQN5qhfZnn06tE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Reporting DMARC policy in A-R header fields
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:06:20 -0000

On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:12 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> Since we're at it, besides the spam folder, is it fine if the MDA sets IMAP
> keyword $Junk[*] or $Phishing[†] or would we dare registering a new one?
>

I think that's part of the discussion in the JMAP/EXTRA WGs.

--Kurt