IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Tue, 29 December 2020 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860443A0809 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Ln477tyDmOq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE913A07F7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id 15so9723248pgx.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc.com; s=fluffulence; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=8hCe5S+reayl8jFlnm+YMyKg2KvUT8uTZkNv2r1t0k8=; b=mHTrKc1iFMs+lf4VompqSuLWTfQM63ufVAg/8arCUvFFCbf0RCOtGK+RdUEc58RtIQ Srd40bySwODZyurHvf2vWMVXloUueM2NLd3B6TKdqzsSFgdLrtRjB4ARvzG82BJgPFyt ZBbKs2t+DKAXSx2k3sRDZHDZ/9lOB+q367DsEYr+9R1cuP//awtoyslD6Gl9Ax43qdmK Q0McDw5G3KJSXaSJaUqqdt3oP47CJURDvQkdKe/CG+Xrd+GOMN5+wgAr7aoDuy8buEYn zoj08FN4YXpdPkYZSydel++KqYO86wTYetCdytn5SFUih2dy5ttu3YnyVqCob0F3hrf1 Llhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=8hCe5S+reayl8jFlnm+YMyKg2KvUT8uTZkNv2r1t0k8=; b=ORV0k8+bVAoLpIhDIEBEIP4RtIr8UvWvOidSkXANRu3KEB3GpiSYipg0XwSqr+L+c1 Cbo+gkcjm6IWWc5D44JWlKXOSPjWTpBuUt9cswybAOipMEKPPABwbcLF7cpy/XW8Ra+o T6z+4ut7yF9LaZgR/TsFtEKtwu7nQzFTeVC3usm9o4NOZN/+62SabBNiMP+Ied8myKQv O9c3UM22my2E929w/f4FKS3f9tkDyXbX9Yhs17hHIxKOf/UF6RLrLh3y8PQTnCe01usE DmrfDTSOtTVje0155fDZeEpYvBsKWPSd38VPBHjacbSWtZnAbshGakbysK7iAW2fHtsL Oq4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jhC+UsrqwruDDIAL41jEomQDqqBrzOrK1pjylnSYAwAGClZy2 twRmOy9KQZJgOT1OZIkbKqZTwjeLY4UewA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzn0Qg+eIQC9HDZPuJBjog/ovjqXW6SAxWSN5vVkKQ+mUFkFnIlPIj0wWby/boVg9d0aKaZOQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e24f:: with SMTP id y15mr48451081pgj.366.1609268615539; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan ([107.182.37.0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 73sm32721801pga.26.2020.12.29.11.03.34 for <dmarc@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:34 -0800 (PST)
To: dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20201229185909.856AD34F063E@ary.qy>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <5d0793ae-de65-cd1d-32ef-c909202a0eb6@mtcc.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 11:03:33 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20201229185909.856AD34F063E@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/PhcDPhW7-w47H9OC0YnXZ6-2VRo>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 19:03:38 -0000

On 12/29/20 10:59 AM, John Levine wrote:
>
> Don't forget
>
>   o Normal forwarding of SPF validated mail
>   o Authorized third party senders with no access to DKIM keys
>
If by "authorized" you mean authorized by the originating domain, I don' 
t have a lot of sympathy since they can delegate them a selector and 
update their DNS. Not doing so is just lazy.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email