Re: [dmarc-ietf] [dbound] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt

Jothan Frakes <jothan@jothan.com> Wed, 03 April 2019 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jothan@jothan.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4623C12011C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:20:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jothan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdULQFlVorPx for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe44.google.com (mail-vs1-xe44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2FD71200E5 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe44.google.com with SMTP id i207so10767887vsd.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jothan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CwjlInjtZCaIUsv6RvkmS4aC9HRscDK9Gw9M4bj8O5Y=; b=rnB2xR6HUcBUWrCMAYBBSw2/Z7phe13/rlN7lLLzd/exFCgV7e0CLoS9zSW45g7Pcc mbfhhsDUOOtiQX6P+hXyIfhf+0CQ8iR85eB9OD6mej5ZAx8ggG2lj7TB3z1C7OCImY03 EeEXQrYxHZ5x7u6u48Hmr5NK5xwg0HooO+nFjyz/75fSD1NBc5KOozvV9ArWk6BO0b2L dZnhYNg3PNm+lCpxnja8cenGt8B18tEUMm/j+pnfz1hnWR67HNKotHPypB4kMG25SIX4 QTzb6phDi3SDnZwS0U7JI/cx4cuupRyIpr+875tzCyTqD+zc1hAd8WllW52oTB/BUNc4 fkIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CwjlInjtZCaIUsv6RvkmS4aC9HRscDK9Gw9M4bj8O5Y=; b=f3exrDgdvF4hhVrBqA6EzN8kxMDPmahdcPxVuMbB0xqnFuaY+k8Tg35tGpLO0QduvS fRprH4IUpEa7nJj5X78OG9zkKezyaJ3EQnBl84/5riNrSlW+gGa/zkz9LDY+tGtowu6j nlTWmcl7mFvzveh0vx+pVWo+fU7iTEifHgt6cVRcYKv8Gg8eviNnmmNJUXRbE3FgGKdX xWP228pMF7sS4YlroWf0C/SsmseKu4/aZpk9t3GzmyeQHOeSMQcoIRqblKsJNOuLpnlf cCHHc43rV54/UnPcw78DGpC5uxbUdbQr05Fp0Lt+E1i+ccttJrctORJ/QdRSWErr7HQu BILg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWFmnmxsGUswAm0wzgnjRV7+C2ir6r81T7pb3QNnebbxBPSAj6u 6gIUE/OndkCwT3u91EPxiQgzAE5fpeLo+5cxolTQ1A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxMBE7+UXfqMmur3VH3TFi3RgD9nKf6LeT47kyrfFDQVSbXPrBjW1j+XQ+GaD4b1QucWZLWaeE24JAgRx2Y6fA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:76d7:: with SMTP id r206mr1656907vsc.25.1554322819015; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190403175820.8391420115F376@ary.qy> <2445c121-f77b-0fa2-ca6a-402479abb5a7@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031430270.21189@ary.qy> <7e61b445-3844-f769-6a59-16fa396388d0@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1904031459480.21189@ary.qy> <AFE01C0B-E47E-4D4E-B60C-FA0810BBE8F8@gmail.com> <d89a2bf0-2fd3-7be9-e75f-33f565748c92@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <d89a2bf0-2fd3-7be9-e75f-33f565748c92@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Jothan Frakes <jothan@jothan.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:19:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGrS0FJqa8tfE7kNcPR8=PPWXVVKkZzuxbnU+FNsuFZsvF50Zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, dbound@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/PvRQMZoLphvVgXZfbtR853XKc2c>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [dbound] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-dcrocker-dns-perimeter-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 20:20:22 -0000

> ... registrar
> GUIs are perhaps the main barrier for new RRTYPEs ...

s/registrar/DNS Management/

these are often not one in the same - and the only reason I make that
pedantic distinction is that the frequent situation where
DNS Management != registrar
heavily impedes DNSSEC end-to-end configuration, because it needs
config harmony within the registration path (registrar) and the
resolution path (DNS)

Hope that made sense.  Just want to ensure these are not conflated to
avoid drag on efforts