Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C133A0CC1 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sh-q1OcC_vba for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F5BF3A0CB0 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id b15so961717iln.3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ozomyOuqgRBgs4b9MO2SkPnhjjw0Q2hVmMJocla+78Y=; b=VSiMhYbYQHbZ9VPsN6lkbET/fG/ptUj7S05oo/96qk6+fuCi7KeFQcbb5LJpGn+/eF upz82E+lb+FQ88TF74E0LySVTnsYNdSY/9DAzveiHQVMpeU+wWyiwml5rmwoo/iIlpwk iAv9bc9Bv5JPWVtDpeNbwoHLoTlsCYn6jmiDQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ozomyOuqgRBgs4b9MO2SkPnhjjw0Q2hVmMJocla+78Y=; b=TNIWASYnh99ZSHLCbZhvEJskOCQgIXmEcKkjnrHgYeCTSCGDDYIfHYx3pvgx2xmUJ3 OERkpMU3hQBWDEKY1H5ZbTAJ8hUZJDYvnpoXEeM/Waht20u57ryeZuFjFVXe105zjDno NDEIbNZjDDuVKycCrhpKQnQ5ihm7sa/GB16elzECE7NxN0I+vNa22YYfdFUhOrVKbQB+ 60717U285jDxZ9SGNdmqa6APovHfowxfnyS1YtE2fizJ3RmMnG9XbUzFePfsMSzKwba2 2tSPzIVTujVXQbhQPlIqy2Chdr6xDAPgrSRrYQT2hgvkYjSJU85bVsRAmVzcmCoJTZ// I4MA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXOLr04JSWPWLaq8pJy5cBnUZEzQeFRjbOg4TDqGMrPoZCJeSH9 x1EBBOTqx0q8mrHfeki5SFiQe8N+TKdPkgSrSYlMbgbDML4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwflEQyBiEWJQZDVAtX2kY7Z1oVB5nsTHG0MtzZaO4aLNM9ff1vrRbF60PlJFx+5PwebQ148ry2tyEWFWb+59M=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:b506:: with SMTP id f6mr1364882ile.103.1582840205903; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:50:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbp2hNrgF_xxhKRRODQ6HP=U5_K-r3Wtm1wJZOZcKup3g@mail.gmail.com> <9DE9E7DC-FE60-4952-8595-B2D087A6B780@kitterman.com> <CADyWQ+GSP0K=Ci22ouE6AvdqCDGgUAg3jZHBOg3EwCmw=QG84A@mail.gmail.com> <CABuGu1obn55Y2=CuEYRYCEO3TYYNhYTsdkesQ67O61jRyfO=wA@mail.gmail.com> <79b1cbe6-8a53-9157-63de-210fd2bad89a@dcrocker.net> <CAL0qLwZnomZJTbFB=dfFdw2vWg7B0ObRuoage3pcWaYmP9Kp4A@mail.gmail.com> <082f2102-693c-136d-874c-1182f12a6818@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZjd2qhejctNK0BM7j=SscaE45Mm7U9iWJNvO-GuhEKQA@mail.gmail.com> <1aa141c4-50d8-4f2e-c72f-e1d0bf19f280@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwY-v-VS-Wai-aqGRPOj1i8HxqMrYybzsNJGzN2dTHvG9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ+U=1qw63VGCEXAqA7AhL_GpidwcWBuLV-aAeJgvcTagi8=dA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZobYEj7nmj0B5vHH5ED+BBv2uocGPVRSN-S0-xFzL68w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ+U=1o4qchsgm9ei3=WuW5qWOPOzdY8ox83rM23b1UZLc=Z0Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZaNS-J5WSAmqh1DcwNKNXFo+9udt_SiUUqWNdVFxCnOw@mail.gmail.com> <281fcc15-049c-b586-8514-0322cd0578c6@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <281fcc15-049c-b586-8514-0322cd0578c6@tana.it>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:48:59 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1q5c5jte7k-9YRCG=Oy0wzyjd+ZD4t9+iMJ5CBiY+OokA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035a812059f95b44f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/QtYjc5X9AYrw-NnCSFh03cs9auY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 21:50:09 -0000

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 4:16 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

> On Thu 27/Feb/2020 06:30:59 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> >
> > With a completed (and now seven month old) Working Group Last Call on the
> > PSD document, and as far as I can see no sustained objection, we should
> > proceed toward publication.
>
> Great!
>

+1

> I will put this question to the working group: Can we solve this problem
> by
> > switching the document to Informational status, and can the working group
> > accept that outcome?
>
> If publishing as experimental would further delay publication, I'd accept
> informational.
>

Also agree.

--Kurt