IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

Alwin de Bruin <Alwin.deBruin@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <alwindebruin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B37E3A0D7B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:37:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CsUt9w245Cem for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:37:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD943A0D7D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id u18so29150550lfd.9 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:37:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NShmKOnkj32+dTf2ZFpR5r2oHI1vpxrWkpNtM3fFelA=; b=sophQdmm2mJAR8SJ3hA7si6W6pgn7n+XpBRIUbUMvo4xZtd36nmMLDROM3D7S0ydrG SGTkza/pFtedxB4Gk9FOZPNA/rEAbSEvAPUagopx5lCkt81KV9T6jYrPk7w1v6HosoyH XjtgW8ye50nZrV/qoVWuReV5e24qsxcR8AM9cN7ugAFvj+r8gZC93YupNyol45d1IzqO HKnCCr18GnxYqb4aXYzqY9ZT/8zDLFPKfi7dsbzXsLEXF4Ly4iMIoHdukBTt/FWbenxh adTu3FGsH/UYzcZyUubTNzFB3z5UpUh/LP4xltV5QF4t015YUH7LPYMo1oTo83gov0EF 5GFQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=NShmKOnkj32+dTf2ZFpR5r2oHI1vpxrWkpNtM3fFelA=; b=iseEr61oXFbfSQ7hQoYuF0em/cRNusSh4j49tB6PPVzSTnpSnXUuFxUkHUmkSg4Vmt X5fJb3sxBHKzqLel7zGFDiI+mVS61FhG707XWPS+9snKP6SuI3i6gJ365Fsrj/3aoD+J nFXL5/PFtb6G3eX/1M5MWPOzYJC2DYsf9BxCVLRXA9VpZgoRMv0lHxVGK8z6zePFpN4R ofv62syEXee8lyIbxOvNEZg2pkloHbDN+WZ0AujX5pWJyKqvgkOm5kVCB+/eB+Xwg5Qb KRAe/irEagkE2hSkt/xMtULadPuuW24kvLQTMSp0lWpVDTd7b9h8lDwkt5mbk4OR8lBZ 3pvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Ie7Cjmwkxckle7KRbhJ1vcarsyUU5WeqLfvHVZAMwJhNIjrwA xqYalJ0+F5vRxwxYXyRHgUh19R5BwD8imQQuPUevZFrE1NM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLNyAL9/z6sm0sPedh3QkhlUwRIHMA00wnFQGsyJCyukj94ONuqa95fRmT0n9lb3xI0hXmqakItnzqesd/4Is=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:58ee:: with SMTP id v14mr1323134lfo.16.1605605825695; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 01:37:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4BA72AFF-4058-4F8C-93B9-A5084E634779@contoso.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BA72AFF-4058-4F8C-93B9-A5084E634779@contoso.com>
From: Alwin de Bruin <Alwin.deBruin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:36:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMDtChM-wMn_bW=P5+UMZTTM2u5m3XNjB6ig7HBMKvbu039srw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e3d2c005b44a3cbf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/QuEL0Q4VtU4Zw2UYYSoLKJmZ9nI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:57:46 -0000

> If the meeting were to be held, who (besides Jim) was planning to attend?

Scheduled time to be there "virtually" at the meeting.

- Alwin

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 at 10:28, Gren Elliot <gelliot=
40mimecast.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> > If the meeting were to be held, who (besides Jim) was planning to attend?
>
> I am - admittedly because I thought this would be a good chance to learn
> more about DMARC.
> Would this not be a good chance to potentially increase interest?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email