Re: [dmarc-ietf] Header Rewriting

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 07 January 2021 13:21 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772DD3A10BC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:21:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=BaYHVw9U; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=rkEaC73M
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wBsWBH98kGw2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:21:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE3F43A10CF for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 05:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 23804 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2021 13:21:17 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=5cf9.5ff70acd.k2101; bh=mLQd1gf095EueVDLW1yMSqpPwFpBBJk19CXY3B5JiiA=; b=BaYHVw9ULwuG08fcIqsNAdPpWZNoyjivmG/HILnOcgW5r6p4dLl8zoum/EAn7c5ihoHKqgvsGQeiM0j2vPJPj5K/MqxK+UDM+Zr8kFsUFMrvxxh9qTL61IkYR9p8yzcpaH9S4TOSEZU8TI3x0jFChYl8hSuWY4shVAYnXpRInTOnpf9A+cxS3CCAlvocvxPkx+MKL4rSmydx6sCvHqvp12bqJwOfRFuYw7PUrpXhqSh53c2LE87CVhNzzAnv9q+GLDTrBgSmOr6EJ6aNCLCpqCnpimMtmF2lDpOSYlZbNp62SaX+NjiI97ng3/t57mfadNDJvEqpXrJtZJQQ7TTuuA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=5cf9.5ff70acd.k2101; bh=mLQd1gf095EueVDLW1yMSqpPwFpBBJk19CXY3B5JiiA=; b=rkEaC73MSCNHhV5a842qbp4yjV7+Q9Vn+WLTayy1jqenNtT3hEhW/hpgK/Uv9Kr8B+IZ1wqSGLbTadu2uoXvmlWVFvo5Bc2fHfKE/uX3McdStSWLnyq3WrkPD+ajvB85MTrRq7YG72rCMWxy3gk4SmQsYGgzJkxRJQBHoL2FQjk7AdzahYx+dSKbIc0BNNwS6UkYT2BBLDyO1U1Y7uKtSuDsTuqQBUxm07VGjE5xklziEW7alrGQcfKMU/j0d10/n07t/YZR3iHyxiBGbIjWv96nr858nQ9h43rlyFjIa90t9tzsqKTaaRy0TueTzG60oq/I0weFb0aMVoUATzlJ+g==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 07 Jan 2021 13:21:16 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id DA29B5F75A08; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 08:21:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: 7 Jan 2021 08:21:15 -0500
Message-Id: <20210107132115.DA29B5F75A08@ary.qy>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: vesely@tana.it
In-Reply-To: <5effe248-6364-20f3-5ead-c5bb6a2a3afb@tana.it>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/QyziSgxQaXzqgrQPF76qLbq1ajk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Header Rewriting
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 13:21:28 -0000

In article <5effe248-6364-20f3-5ead-c5bb6a2a3afb@tana.it> you write:
>Can we say that?
>
>Would such kind of normative help to improve filters and trust indicators?

No. As Dave has repeatedly reminded us, when we guess about user
interface features, we invariably guess wrong.

Please can we stop this unproductive thread?

R's,
John