IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D64130F82 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:31:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ENsldSjpk-lp for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:31:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38D4130F7C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id x19so156695itl.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:31:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eUDBab6mvM9p2LUvnO6qVaBWS2tmumSOnk+Mx5p4vE4=; b=AQK05m2Dl9y3bX3kXP/ULiKtgOSqpHKtg3M5Vkj1UjM4jtGfH+np1k4bgSPS4oF1wb RiNZz9riJ2qTCyOI50/xTvp9uvasga7yo1a3wIEetdwGY6LT4ajV0VPD4PinWL4AkhJn sbU89V4ZVTL5h8Fbh0l5tdCxGrjQ8oNe9pdwA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eUDBab6mvM9p2LUvnO6qVaBWS2tmumSOnk+Mx5p4vE4=; b=kcPKJoGjO+0l6mMgQ0Y5x/n0NctkholJElOK1OgcI/gdfayLOVleQDpadGHExIfcLd JRvjuM3FZtkG1wFIag4g0UP3Y+UKM31HjlIo9N6xk8H0YvN0x0UKUg7bOX5aDJ6oWtDR wi4YmmPAmApEJsxh2EOEvLARxWYEnqBCn1EvaG+ogkPGtrqXw/hmKtZJkaEeKgl1Ruhz dHa0VNct+P8HnBnmHQ2WgyPhHMMfL/O/lv7j/cBsQhhE/+MQvWi+/vjm8dSs0ZtE5GUL tAVfHXfjoeSVFiMoaslGPSPc/2O2sgl3N2G6969EDQQX4/WzrOu74pX3a+O+tS9RS3jv oGRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYU2pS4JBMhWbuy8Q2snWyxy2uhWcKYSJJ34vk1cPJRsgNSIao+ LtTrMlfmmxs4ylPTZK7LgApUWgzPXWCfsSgwfzGGhuPGa9/qW32M
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WEnwc06zCcHHAYOQI+DHXT0afZh8vqZOKsnVW+r5Yph9Ji29wJv6oUNJqEjCvjGanMQ3HHcCkqCNN41IGEtyg=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:8302:: with SMTP id d2mr97397ite.78.1543606285065; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:31:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154275534023.29886.12970892679231398383.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJ_d96SuGEQ=n9nqM=foBO3jVPTqimeojVsEHUHC7kLiw@mail.gmail.com> <1543604417.3723984.1594680736.00216E5A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1543604417.3723984.1594680736.00216E5A@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:31:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1pAugP-xTh6G1X0eHc2xU5We5DMdKMWxqDaik+PQ+_KFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Tim Draegen <tim@dmarcian.com>, "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis@ietf.org, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004b7146057be6d83e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/SF1aR_aUAw_EewiMt4-bskHICnQ>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:31:28 -0000

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:00 AM Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, at 9:39 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> > I actually agree with this: I think the better answer is to go back to
> > "obsoletes" and to have this document include the details of what was
> > put in the registries before.
>
> I think incorporating older registrations is the cleaner way of dealing
> with Ben's & Benjamin's DISCUSSes, as then the document is self contained
> and there is no need for readers to see obsoleted RFCs. So this would be my
> preference.
>
> If the WG doesn't want to do this, then the document needs editing to be
> correct as per Benjamin's DISCUSS.
>
> Best Regards,
> Alexey
>

>From a committee POV, I have no objection. I think that the current
arrangement was preferred by the author.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email