Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E2B1293FB for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:37:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uE-b-R8lz6RM for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:37:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it1-x134.google.com (mail-it1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9400A12426A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:37:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it1-x134.google.com with SMTP id j79-v6so3198024itb.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:37:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=unoailACrEhVj7fh57haSAY0/CX8newiu2DCZASJxJE=; b=ilsQwznu4oN7bNLtbwXly4bZe3r3rnMaK0XyJMkafBZ3XRQ2Ywh7OUFGWJEO7QuIZH 4FgUPTuVbFFvHbJB3vGo9mfuIwJAKT05wnbsGLwaW/PJT4nmpTh8PY/ok17ejo4NMiat SLKq4GLZtwdrJRBxOyc+0y38Ajo81WHqrOw9CvUOaRv7Xg/xGsl0lf00SdYF/fVqaGSg 7i3x8+MAO8elgMWXGu2/OK1sGu4um6FSF2sYXpE0S0jqMrRrax1AGaidbJ0XoqXZZlyy m7FxZrWRTz6vjejuX0ufjA3dTBISsh+0Xwj4H1GoPDU5Q9PKYI71B5XB+usb+8wZeO/F te1A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=unoailACrEhVj7fh57haSAY0/CX8newiu2DCZASJxJE=; b=R+RkhqnLiAGZucVF4jTHD33Pz8APbzQTUsaEHUkLcoBMdG9WVj3qD9ZwH1gOszw34k 1KNOM4J8HB7JsxQfM6VluMnaEgk0BnIljSOfPYBpuY1xW0+WJMYmpPeIJF3vK2DckPmz NiTEwxsEePfhSaxaAzA0Tf16eXxXNYgKThaOBut2PruEypEwydV3p60D8VPb9gljkawh hv4F3pcsFWLckKZecf3nX+ZTnYMPw5sS5W6SvEgbVuTS93f1wc8rXJ0MM/ktVSxe1znz hVwaTq7Tmr0JzKXSUaSOO/U8U3AJRm8RN9R0D2mdP+ygvC+NgmNDJhpcmYZipmiof4pV zOAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJzYRXSAClgm6rF8bLI1umsSFO+iDeM0lALzhRDJs6/5m3l4JKU Q2sX5ypH2j/lDmdzb9ttcywqr9zPSmPEFHEgvt4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eqfQELHD2EoGWfyfHf12uEX9mjgthoVkusbmRQ1i8uifpyujf5oiqdlBN+wEvokvcTnE+zeW6L5wYFo+feW6A=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:85d4:: with SMTP id r203-v6mr1422166itd.124.1541702224891; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:37:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <93BFC1AD-9CC4-4CB4-89E1-A735AF5CD8E4@kitterman.com> <635dea71-2077-9a1a-e7a2-8594697e1068@tana.it> <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com> <CABuGu1pXaXioyPTV6OXD3hWBXVjt5+kk0dqaZwbDcKaU+Y6q5A@mail.gmail.com> <446b8d5d-c059-a7d7-c38f-9c3a92241adf@tana.it> <CAL0qLwZF55yaxZKYY8AQdcRfUr2WjMwfpd2FVWn3hCR67_E5eg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZF55yaxZKYY8AQdcRfUr2WjMwfpd2FVWn3hCR67_E5eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 13:36:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EQkaGsDbT50g3-jG9NDkrHWVmhKJHruZ0vnvw5pV4DDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: vesely@tana.it, dmarc@ietf.org, "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000076d19d057a2b85c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/SH3COgRYtS51HBpc__-tzC4Cdwk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 18:37:08 -0000

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 1:20 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:53 PM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>
>>
>> > and maybe it can solve the "PSL problem" if we can constrain the problem
>> > space to just the DMARC issues instead of recreating the
>> > DBOUND-solve-for-all morass.
>>
>> This problem is simpler than DBOUND.  Looking up text policies is common
>> to a
>> handful of protocols.  A careful wording might make some statements
>> reusable in
>> general, even if the focus is kept on DMARC.
>>
>
> Sure, the DMARC case is half of what DBOUND tried to tackle.  If DBOUND
> had focused just on the DMARC use case, it would've succeeded.
>
> If possible, we should be careful to create a solution that's extensible
> to other use cases, not exclusive of them.  Reviewing what DBOUND tried to
> do might be very instructive here.
>
> -MSK
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>