IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 23 November 2020 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4843A0B5D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:58:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=aUY+44Ap; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=XTM/hugx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ptqPg2rtcKc0 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81B4E3A0B5C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:58:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 12686 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2020 22:58:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=318c.5fbc3e9e.k2011; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=FwkuCTSWci3UzAeeznayuDPaEpWWRhgQQyKoD5Nudqg=; b=aUY+44Ap255LexWeHLPPMhHrl2Q38YM4n7rdkqe9sb7+tee5h6h1fI7ri+M8g5yMszNAu06cWcYM+VXpqvFDbBBMMZsyB5GC9ff4ZLFs2vNwM/uHpLkcrf6NqWGYN+wJ776nvuTvffDCOnTcK40LsDrPPJym8qz9fs4M1d8tmavwo9h4Qn3J1BscDXdS1AK4edAo6iq2DLlwiw5AVpMrB+SPOU82kO2zn236zRbdgMG1+GLaFcEFU8q207nwUYKkydqugMgM9vwycXV/dXbBLLFJb6rqK6xyDXkycXPFCQTHfn57yeldpJxwurA9iRe4GlEtAnSM44+2FMapFkTUNg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=318c.5fbc3e9e.k2011; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=FwkuCTSWci3UzAeeznayuDPaEpWWRhgQQyKoD5Nudqg=; b=XTM/hugx0IFwny/0sdzdbRX65EfsCeUmyEf4olE4tzL9FaW2w0d25VzzbFgNu0EkmgxQxkwALei8pa6gSFgbxzOfAdA6oHq/UJqzkMBlyxfmhFvKsLMs0m71XNEMqAw9olhGZ9D9PLNuLBiDSXA1ioaftswvF2sZUt+txrRQkXX1wyB7v/4r2q5cqnpV5IeAPyUBM118uaDJd9tUbH1/5eViZWhn2QMH/Zi8VoYlHbrTZwUwpUDoZeulizg4aUZOcDRO4TNVLSlKSvRR2ZW1wqQ+jYjWE9sgSQy1VWJfeE12oTbmsq7g9OeS7VcKTd4lDCun38oEwizX+OC4I7O0Jw==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 23 Nov 2020 22:58:38 -0000
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:58:37 -0500
Message-ID: <9b926abf-2f35-565c-c4fa-49be3fde64c1@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5eabd3b5-601b-f3c5-1ffa-80e7a8c4e52b@gmail.com>
References: <dcc265f9-a143-5093-eba0-94ee059c7cc7@mtcc.com> <CAMSGcLCzN5q_p_TtUqv5CvwC0ZTkAY9eFaT_za-1WJXgRUmF4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8nN+827KB+tTuyoeZXoUaKzcYoeizNmwSY-fKTquroPMA@mail.gmail.com> <e3d428f4-1a29-4c6f-4a31-96a24a347e54@gmail.com> <rph9gd$2mp3$1@gal.iecc.com> <4a800bd1-0334-137b-ab71-b98cc1d038cc@gmail.com> <ec7eb8b4-71a5-166-6d4b-49829e1bbcb2@taugh.com> <5eabd3b5-601b-f3c5-1ffa-80e7a8c4e52b@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/SVI8ezcNC9f-zyjy60PqXjGklS8>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC questions
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 22:58:41 -0000

>> I believe that Brandon has specifically said that Gmail sees this problem 
>> and that is why whitelisting mail from mailing lists isn't adequate. 
>
> And that constitute "meaningfully document[ing]"?

Works for me.  I doubt I was the only person wondering why it needed all 
that mechanism when whitelisting mailing lists got you most of the way 
there, particularly since you need that whitelist anyway to know when to 
start ARC analysis.

> And, again, when ARC work was pursued, I don't recall anyone claiming that 
> mailing lists were (significant) sources of misbehavior.

Well, OK.  Please feel free to provide footnoted documentation of what 
the actual motivation for ARC was if you believe it was something else.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email