Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04, was third party authorization, not, was non-mailing list

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 30 August 2020 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA3B3A0BCD for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=hNJZz+au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=OR8IEyOW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l2FrqdP6alPh for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 497A63A0BCC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 96246 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2020 16:27:49 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=177f1.5f4bd385.k2008; bh=L9HoT24Zzq9NAVN6KOEPP0wiuB3J60K9eRVqfNbYpmI=; b=hNJZz+auUEtPKVlI+efXnkHOowkgCWjgt6nFuAD9rUcfec13rjkGxsgGISCcvedT9lL/Jgr7RURzGN0eoy3hhjSOc7Zp+uipTwpmEkFAM3jCHV9cupxYhHVdw1VZJj7JeTkaGMlFiuwbM9SRwbLy6x8R5xC9S9CfzkX58d3JERE9iRbLM7vqBED4MdxzrdO/XMhYavEtdWVqMEA/B5oLq/8y0Gr2KfVM/lBVOfSt5XB6fOAUoxTbtoV8Pmg80mgIOk/KvruwWzPJvJB/DsaTJE4JyPiSrb+StYliGXy9HWC4lEuNq2M7Sfuu/T59QB1FiEN2DqZv/n+kTrjSVeZnxw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=177f1.5f4bd385.k2008; bh=L9HoT24Zzq9NAVN6KOEPP0wiuB3J60K9eRVqfNbYpmI=; b=OR8IEyOWUwpJGYqHXPAExn/jD+oPrxhXChzDcup4GVxDl+Ezn+YLgC+szb16YRZTz1+Hn1QIjdFV+jKtGz2b0jPHYGzLX9NVDMTFAA8UwH1WfiSXasgeeNE5eW5I1j68SkGx5K8KeYjPdMNi2B/9OOM9O0bAXWHPz6lJxzEoJySolqtt0a0eCPukw+N2FjtPI/CBgl28833xbg8jBlVFQDuOYNtyuV85gRv5mmerfydre3n6rSQsY/gyY7Nu91QPWbnrqMhdnx3u4azTYOo4Qv2OxgXzpnytVieksHzEZp4u27ul6cnPRClQTIthz+zVLhJwYaTferVaM4annB2rPA==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 30 Aug 2020 16:27:49 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id C66D31F4A314; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:27:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 12:27:48 -0400
Message-Id: <20200830162748.C66D31F4A314@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: fenton@bluepopcorn.net
In-Reply-To: <46d35938-50ee-871d-d88b-e93c68555dff@bluepopcorn.net>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Sfu-KVkv2YXl0ZrczGn2ziZ5yf0>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-levine-dkim-conditional-04, was third party authorization, not, was non-mailing list
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:27:53 -0000

In article <46d35938-50ee-871d-d88b-e93c68555dff@bluepopcorn.net> you write:
>But what I was getting at is that the "weak" signature might not have to
>be any different from any other DKIM signature (except possibly to
>specify the authorized mediator). It's just that a verifier might fully
>verify the mediator's signature, and verify the original signature but
>not check to see if the body hash matches. ...

I just sent in a slightly refreshed version of my conditional signature draft
which says exactly that.

It's not very different from the orginal version I sent in over six years ago.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-dkim-conditional/

R's,
John