[dmarc-ietf] New version of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage posted
Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com> Tue, 23 October 2018 06:09 UTC
Return-Path: <smj@crash.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E7912F1AC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:09:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=crash.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eb-EmJi9VtH4 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from segv.crash.com (segv.crash.com [IPv6:2001:470:1:1e9::4415]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93E7D130DED for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.23.117.28] ([216.52.21.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by segv.crash.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/cci-colo-1.7) with ESMTPSA id w9N69LqG031774 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:09:34 GMT (envelope-from smj@crash.com)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 segv.crash.com w9N69LqG031774
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crash.com; s=201506-2k; t=1540274976; bh=b4qtgb477ZBLyyu/e2IPkgcZG0/ViFgnnl78OPspor4=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=Ug+V04kmvzIRAPPdbt+VvScZV4oN6h3gKOs2l3CMAlEDHXt0x+gF4MhFapgje8MUh 7XijX2PpYu1b9zlRS2zMrcLmu+h8r6JVcDAh7SjNSUTllNGu4uWa6V+XpiVN81fJfg PA901wfd+IIrGr9efXqMyAw/+J56RiJWNfvwKzI38qSkXh986MdjqMOQ12uNKW3z5t 6KZf4M52wqqtamhA0D2v8mqlDAm40M4bjAghZqBSuE1L2o5f7mibXM2XLxAom3me6Q BLpr/g/SWJG2OiqgfEz6NNwpkNsNLiRv/uulhS5Vlcubg0AzmnR76s8xxSeOcYU8OB P3M1OB91l1fTA==
X-Authentication-Warning: segv.crash.com: Host [216.52.21.1] claimed to be [172.23.117.28]
To: dmarc@ietf.org
From: Steven M Jones <smj@crash.com>
Message-ID: <90535677-7c53-1698-e803-3c0869b29c20@crash.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:09:21 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (segv.crash.com [72.52.75.15]); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:09:34 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TIChqNBmdSiAWMCEpU0VSmo_Mlg>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] New version of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage posted
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 06:09:39 -0000
Greetings, I've submitted the changes to the "ARC Usage" I-D that I had on-hand, primarily because the previous version was going to expire on October 25th, and the I-D freeze for IETF103 was going to occur this evening. That deadline was extended by 24 hours, but I opted not to push it (further)... Consider this a reminder that your questions and suggestions are welcome. New version: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage-06 Diff from -05 to -06: https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-usage-06.txt Yes, I know I missed updating a couple things. Yes, some formatting is off because I uploaded the XML instead of the TXT version. We'll fix 'em in the next rev. Thanks, --Steve.
- [dmarc-ietf] New version of draft-ietf-dmarc-arc-… Steven M Jones
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] New version of draft-ietf-dmarc-… Jeremy Harris
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] New version of draft-ietf-dmarc-… John Levine