IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs p=quarantine

Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu> Sun, 20 December 2020 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <me@junc.eu>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4842E3A11FA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:01:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junc.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0CI8-dC5No-E for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:01:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.junc.eu (mx.junc.eu [172.105.72.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0CB73A11F6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 14:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [127.0.0.1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with SMTP id 34EB97FED2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:01:17 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junc.eu; i=@junc.eu; l=715; q=dns/txt; s=default; t=1608501677; h=from : subject : date : to; bh=QHspFE4eMjigSVznX0Vloz6pLpN6UpDFY3Dnwz1RY5I=; b=Cw0MhwGh+XMSW+UKkqgQwRIUw/cLenrtjQ9/dhHt/gaTvsmaHpYRludAF7oL3Ah9UUoWn ANH2E5oLVlu/WJBTyB8ePNqLoxeQ6fMBM2YTu8d0tN2TthlebNL7Gsm+MUw+KtzUfhTFvil hSEjxXPyT1zALJTt1pJexKtRWsxtHhI=
Received: from localhost.junc.eu (localhost.junc.eu [IPv6:::1]) by mx.junc.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 180577FE44 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:01:17 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 23:01:17 +0100
From: Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <dd6c5588-8e84-5f90-931-51b4dd4c27cc@taugh.com>
References: <1e61f7c4-c6d2-5dab-dfc7-f1fd740e1d0d@tana.it> <20201219194954.BF87E2ADF1FB@ary.qy> <CAJ4XoYfx=qRyARbcf7m8T6+_2hJKifgAoBXBdfmqGucanrUJfw@mail.gmail.com> <9b7cc1c9-e031-4ef8-8d92-2c16cc4fa073@tana.it> <dd6c5588-8e84-5f90-931-51b4dd4c27cc@taugh.com>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.8
Message-ID: <ceaf2e324f8cf042b1b31621c79d5d59@junc.eu>
X-Sender: me@junc.eu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TKCjCIA9CqfW310o9XvjK0zHpUA>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC vs p=quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 22:01:24 -0000

On 2020-12-20 19:13, John R Levine wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>>> question is who steps up to provide such shared lists.
>> 
>> Dnswl.org counts about 25K domains.
> 
> I suppose one might try them but I expect most of them are not sending
> forwarded mail.

only sending to maillists here that breaks dkim and do not add arc 
before breaking dkim, world of 2020 cant be better :=)

> I've finally gotten around to doing ARC checks in my SMTP daemon so I
> can see who's adding ARC seals.

hopefully maillists stops dkim signing, its the incorrect place to solve 
breaking dkim

now that nearly all maillists i am on have showed what not to do, its 
hopefully solved soon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email