IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Abolishing DMARC policy quarantine

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Wed, 24 July 2019 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6F3120103 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:07:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qFTd7ozTgYwW for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:06:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D181B12006E for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id z15so28817943lfh.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:06:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e3lcNhRvJC1DJ3phl414aEJSsBC7dv0e93gG17Jzy0k=; b=ZknPnP3jO6SCQTssycVR4I7Y7Dos2m22eQxGwRiU1Zb2DgcKVDVVl5VIK0fHaOqH3E A3kkRWef+MJcqUjzlWHU1Ey0st0n98SwWbqSeexTo1/j1ywjYOYOz1Thz0yegd/ISEwl 4AEjsDG8QorlApOWUHh+Y5GPd1BuvcXlU92w7qCgU/AYeKGDshrf2hu21CgOnyjPJ20D 6djOxWSZdx0YuABhLAv/dGE924r3DxSLdxaQECUvPhZtnS49ADHT7IlyzBdOBychQeEV R3QIL3AjXr/PKy7zZHQZ0EyxrMVSMuzcEFbodMxkwHowmaZGmBBkQtFeLeQ61sXy9meb 5D9g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e3lcNhRvJC1DJ3phl414aEJSsBC7dv0e93gG17Jzy0k=; b=iDvLpO0H4sAdnqHVGPjnZ7W9SE4BfUthVTxPuP9IGYiQZ+NcqWOf6LsSx4jH3COVE5 b94re3BaqmRg2g2KoPHfEQGndBE1hlCU2gWcXxFQKu9so8UZDNZYzdk0553LaKIFCcHN 7Xby0bwatSFfk9LOOmZMz4L4EaXg68Uc9b0KyvxAfEhG/dQ2hTWVXey2bXzmFb7ZWNUQ 8a4p121/GJ7/RWcW3OcFFjRupCUfeT1IOqnH45JrHN6wCguMXNtYnQ0eHZ5UX8eN2LTG WCHxbDFDl80ujGkm2pOigSnnLJ9n5aNzFqmLZRcByO4J01toUH2yo1vuSs/67SvtbKyl Ydgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXLl5rGx51Ov/qap0y6F34qTvF6J6uMik8uRAVjM5hzgqSzkpVl 6sfkWtibILcB4VtDwUhuvRK4DDjestMEmWeY4oOoWV3I+FI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxHFHsfT9EY7c5aOWuh6FNqIprXi8xu5Ljpu17DLQcg641gQYPHgS03THlACHwimK23ct2pyJm3mgjdi/KBX+o=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7006:: with SMTP id h6mr38958873lfc.5.1564009616964; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 16:06:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a8ac130a671f5bcd1bf9f09781325e84a9f1fda6.camel@aegee.org> <b903c983-5c65-5b17-62bf-9ff42ffdbaaa@corp.mail.ru> <CAJ4XoYeJRcGfO7LntM6LBeJ5rMOcb0D=ya31Rm8utoWTqE7oXQ@mail.gmail.com> <0295aa1e-733a-b3ae-14cb-edcb2050d6af@corp.mail.ru> <CAL0qLwYYEMofia2S4a8oXsf02fnJg7y+DovvMWZENUW+4yUyiw@mail.gmail.com> <36cba315-e738-ddec-0f6c-2e6086b69d11@corp.mail.ru> <70da228a75b94c28097ce0c25bc407d93e86c4c2.camel@aegee.org> <CAL0qLwbX4T5=EFZtwPPk9aYdUpR72c4r5t8SB1WETkpXEtUahQ@mail.gmail.com> <1951EFA7-0695-4B98-9CB1-3ECCEFEBF321@wordtothewise.com>
In-Reply-To: <1951EFA7-0695-4B98-9CB1-3ECCEFEBF321@wordtothewise.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 19:06:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbixESJypwDG3NMuv22+Lb3w-iHPok8xZf-hy3Fiu38EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a50c6b058e755de3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TNCxgVjYcrZJyo6zvb9SJC1PzWU>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Abolishing DMARC policy quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 23:07:00 -0000

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 4:45 PM Steve Atkins <steve@wordtothewise.com>
wrote:

> > It's interesting that the industry has decided to interpret "p=reject;
> pct=0" the way we intended "p=quarantine; pct=100".
>
> It's semi-explicitly defined that way in the RFC, isn't it?
>

If so, we should fix it because (a) I don't think that's how we intended
it, and (b) in any case, nothing in there should be only semi-explicit.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email