Re: [dmarc-ietf] Abolishing DMARC policy quarantine

Laura Atkins <laura@wordtothewise.com> Wed, 12 June 2019 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <laura@wordtothewise.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEC61200C7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wordtothewise.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aKVQigbNqx39 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.wordtothewise.com (mail.wordtothewise.com [104.225.223.158]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D5D1200B3 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.227] (unknown [37.228.251.105]) by mail.wordtothewise.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D4C99F146; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wordtothewise.com; s=aardvark; t=1560346675; bh=NDZXzYrX1WXTuLJOtAJHuNVtrIK2PFefTelnzbghm18=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=GJW3i7wtCLZdXN+5ItzA1+I6hDkVZKA8ExJRSupOegB7IHoBuDANKCfHIdgjoURJA 3Ps3i5CviZKSHCkLKp2BKLD9AaeraIrWaZI2K8RfMXoIXA/O+vgvLIK5fFMwylGbeL p3/iEMUx6ChMpWPNf0dnUyXpjieWiRWYfVtf0200=
From: Laura Atkins <laura@wordtothewise.com>
Message-Id: <4B7278AE-7AFC-4183-A879-644D4F9AAB69@wordtothewise.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D24DA5BF-C2A9-4C1A-9BC3-D3E8E3471E3E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:37:52 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5D00FDFA.8040303@isdg.net>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
To: hsantos@isdg.net
References: <a8ac130a671f5bcd1bf9f09781325e84a9f1fda6.camel@aegee.org> <5D00FDFA.8040303@isdg.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TQbnf3emlBAtkp3MFiYCBxYvmAg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Abolishing DMARC policy quarantine
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 13:38:00 -0000

> On 12 Jun 2019, at 14:28, Hector Santos <hsantos=40isdg.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> On 6/11/2019 5:00 PM, Дилян Палаузов wrote:
>> 
>> How about, deleting policy Quarantine and instead rephrasing policy Reject:
>> 
>> It is up to the receiving server if it rejects messages failing DMARC, or accepts and delivers them as Junk.
>> 
>> (This does not change the protocol, just the wording)
> 
> I think that is how it was thought it would be handled.  Don't take "rejection" literally, in fact, it can be a discard concept as well.  This is all about local policy. A receiver has the option, based on Local Policy and the implementation software to offer:
> 
>  (o) Reject with 55x before DATA state

Given that the 5322.from is crucial for DMARC, and the 5322.from is transmitted after DATA, how can you evaluate DMARC before DATA?

laura 

-- 
Having an Email Crisis?  We can help! 800 823-9674 

Laura Atkins
Word to the Wise
laura@wordtothewise.com
(650) 437-0741		

Email Delivery Blog: https://wordtothewise.com/blog