IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08

"Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com> Sat, 23 January 2021 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774323A15E6 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=drkurt.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GVQz1stMl18H for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ACD33A15E7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id h11so14882112ioh.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=drkurt.com; s=20130612; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z/oBPeY9dQTN7IFmrsCsxPlKO7PPW2Z+WMfMFHFxZpk=; b=DhD/WUl3adkJmRK2UPd3pHNrAzKSG8gNgz1LWRJ0v/8ZV9x9h4Hh1zqZwaXaDlrQEw QCyxdXu8zFO23sl3sVkWA+03LlQVeoMseyKpqXSEDcnEnL6sV7LCMzzyF3WcBLP0/KBn VE/srgnaL9089jcSpD5goJ4MGD4IM4ksgwo/E=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z/oBPeY9dQTN7IFmrsCsxPlKO7PPW2Z+WMfMFHFxZpk=; b=icyC80txhCzio3RkHYuOr1H07w9fAhh7z4UHKUsqTgaKd+7REZ/0SNV1ZlUjFKNss7 t8UlwO/J5BsZ5ftzdd4HMlhLrjiAxyGrBaMOkq5nu+sqnbs+RNBSl8fTZoif7YdGq8Pw STefxgyJzX4nUhX1pEIgRMGKJL1/7jIScw+zAfmsNX/G37xN7yToWXUG9hDH06AQusCK nDiF+Pi0dPGEKDvKKNGK5WDxKcyqSxNieo2ecqS9m+5C4BfhetBEID9k8vrsHcE8V04U deqU71QoWWiqpmycBKbljgGTMlCQU4CX6Fj2KhSEI+Q9XViQFVINz94KTz/rlsgOcGHU BoMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531L9gnsYZo6dgGcIxQqbx2sfR9RyZekg3AV0tLlsdeGWB4GgoUS rZTxHeusWW33DU9Yf3H96Nj3c/nOthzi+2HolOwX8A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMb2hYOEEOdZsCaMNwDblgNxx2qVkxzEoXFuDPcm2Rj3Qp31FiOwBP6Q6MIEU5IsRxp0jS8e8mLmo0CyWsTJk=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8ac8:: with SMTP id e8mr1635302iot.163.1611363322031; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Fb93SkiAnL4cuCfxC5Wi1ERLeKhguWqAp3j8YEa6JBSA@mail.gmail.com> <87ima4wu3s.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> <CAL0qLwbiOrgsEjZU_V6W8e42SRNoUh7CzyngRMR5RLeQpzrxaQ@mail.gmail.com> <44eec884-a3c7-f0e3-4545-1032369ad3fd@tana.it> <CAL0qLwavpE9r6+O+Dm5EyDYzP9_pTpTbbjMzL1mPTyJky5CKmA@mail.gmail.com> <CADyWQ+Hn5G_WSHjrD3gLL5HwZxDGoV_wxgAuiPc_sutQ4OYhNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Hn5G_WSHjrD3gLL5HwZxDGoV_wxgAuiPc_sutQ4OYhNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 16:55:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CABuGu1oxkNUB_E8Q5do5xCruxXGvqY2461u0ZMZ1J5BFE8dTqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>, Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006a07dd05b986c20f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Te87X4zE8GnoT9e9qYrVWM08YsE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-08
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 00:55:25 -0000

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 3:06 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Here's the paragraph in question
>
>      <t>To determine the organizational domain for a message under
> evaluation,
>         and thus where to look for a policy statement, DMARC makes use of
> a Public Suffix
>         List. The process for doing this can be found in Section 3.2 of
> the DMARC
>         specification.</t>
>

The concern that I have with this wording is that it is (potentially)
misleading. "How" DMARC determines the org domain does not matter at all to
this spec. The important point is that we go to "org-1" in the tree for
this extra lookup.

--Kurt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email