Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 23:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B373A1037 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:27:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SP55rfdN8Wi for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1913A1034 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:27:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id b23so3991616pls.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:27:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=+8nXe4/GsKbJH+L5F32yRjvOhJ2p4rTqDU9wxYaynIo=; b=VC1ucabctd+J6d86J7DE1IrIGhjw/tdsV7sg0+wRbFEwwSmE1DbMXba5bEK6bDzrDQ CgHWU9RyzlBRE7EjoCsgdC77/dKrz+XC0QvoWVIBAEZ0SeQAXHRwHayRM2Zc6X6RUjSr Ujr7oy88nl3nKjTvGIEO7X7olwAGuFYhjFdILDyiJuBiXN5Hc/ssqkzraK8UWjgwrMlt FH/YOJoTSYWCgdAOAVo+ieDZKm4Xzc4Jo0aF8SbqLX4hg3SQXOZL04kEa1NlkoMF2lN7 69QEGuKbI+VoJuaA+o+VMhsx6d+elHpLTFBUfHsLeSv3nh4SMNPYiacv+pa9ac2MqqYZ FFqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=+8nXe4/GsKbJH+L5F32yRjvOhJ2p4rTqDU9wxYaynIo=; b=W5XfrGN3afnP6MTazSnjIQzCZQr/+qnhYfI0UH0u3Rk4P0C/ZLpw/mXuiCqyMTBrgI 9dNjGtGL6mYw1UIEKIATQjeU62TNSSl14cTu3vVM+FtZhL3+fbVLI6WhBYTV2ozuC5Ve LQmBCblUfqEWd5VY7y84sALBFHWeczDUvpOPaVS4fnu5bDmLjzFY+iHW6ih1rPws6vOq OY7ljNWeNVmErcPp5Xl2wMdN6Oz76msTrcOtGlO6hYOizG9snRCbvcnzFUOgH+zcNNIU wn/ecY99G+hkCVQG28PONb13SR7Sj867+we8qQyMD2Ekbaze2cbDtB6/pfVXU8W+Js/O T3HA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lKe2ES7OabO2j7PMfSHB7iAmCQBXJ3fcpjCFIZdLGo2YlaSjB tu1Har/Snrzj1N3ur9dbktpk/xsES0LFHw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyAl4qDp7ufVPiDLv+sbuoOhAqR75rQGLOArTJmb9BRilN2y6mXY6OYsAhel9nyB0PZSX400A==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa04:b029:d8:b7a8:6a3e with SMTP id be4-20020a170902aa04b02900d8b7a86a3emr5940945plb.58.1607124466869; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mike-mac.lan (107-182-42-33.volcanocom.com. [107.182.42.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u6sm6050399pfb.197.2020.12.04.15.27.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:27:46 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <134860ee-5fbf-2fb3-a5b3-4be68806ab22@mtcc.com> <CABa8R6veBqY1fUuoy3Qm=vfrV51_5YyoS0P4SLSbKJP_Qrcn-A@mail.gmail.com> <7224575d-685f-5020-073e-c1880acecc88@mtcc.com> <7e459496-61f8-ddcd-713c-3b6be448090c@gmail.com> <2cecceac-1add-44ec-6e16-e157fee293fe@mtcc.com> <5a577765-4a0d-e1bf-5321-dfeff19d107e@gmail.com> <40d7e78e-7026-c65c-383c-df4e3c537de3@mtcc.com> <6fae9ca6-d8ea-1d62-4156-249191029cc3@gmail.com> <80f9963e-20bf-cdfe-cf3b-cda7b2ed08ab@mtcc.com> <CAOZAAfPbKv-9w9aZhyYUsKkEtR2W90O3JuCfB3pe60qOWtT_zg@mail.gmail.com> <c0ee5678-822c-40b3-9072-e6a4c350f34e@mtcc.com> <6dea9912-83fd-b981-adca-4e6c81047b92@gmail.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <a5e1a7c1-54a2-232d-3356-d9be0bf20f18@mtcc.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:27:44 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6dea9912-83fd-b981-adca-4e6c81047b92@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TeKaXunShv-vHOEzQic9G746m00>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] is DMARC informational?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 23:27:49 -0000

On 12/4/20 3:25 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/4/2020 3:11 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>> Is it really that hard to summarize why the decision was made and 
>> what changed in the bis version? I really don't understand this snipe 
>> hunt.
>
>
> You ask a series of basic question and get a string of responses, 
> which point you to easily-found answers, and you call this a practical 
> joke.    On the offchance you don't mean one that you've instigated, 
> please explain.
>
A bunch of non-responsive responses. If you didn't feel like answering 
the question asked you could have just kept scrolling. I didn't ask for 
pointers, after all.

Mike