Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B3FC128BCC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:19:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjNg8zbmPFzJ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D3112426A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 10:19:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u6-v6so18894804ljd.1 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:19:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mFcoH/BIjD3RGkML20rO9eqPH/4VJ4zxKCsiRqCPCJM=; b=tzPwtdjtduatmnnGnnSnd0aBmpqNwQbH5WU/JbrLHgMAfi9B1gobUjnxYis2FxyUzI BZPijcgPFqP5VI4lZZqkKbDP21mRBfKrlAXxMg1LN35Pl0/qTEv4UzGC6pcxLsqVN9YA XYnuMAAoITEX8b7UJSkMrT2AoiP/zhSaCCUjuCJWRmDBSE3sdYCylsi5gOc8k0N6ZN/m TCIzwiXu8Dh1RxX0LL/9+iQ3bfpuiDzE3wdJixXTe7gV5i0+DJqZJoGk9C221OUXetJO WKBEZ2WeZ7glQflN8tnKxv4/KTVG7iuLbX55p2kw/GIKvRhjuC0kZBBW+aVV9NS9pD1R B6Tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mFcoH/BIjD3RGkML20rO9eqPH/4VJ4zxKCsiRqCPCJM=; b=CE7TmTL6N15EIdNu6srkTkEdaTYCUtn8NdmrFYxKXqb/141UBr+BJ6WtOan6eVQPwr ZppJqSopbomM1ohn3UHFdyqC90/sl9IGkDbpjCSYsmvflp626nCpjkEF+NQWlJgAt69Z IhJT0dmMmTYVIXxKqHegTTvsqNAFPqJg5mEW3XYJcQhwUaK9EJWHj6fBU6W82d+aOaAs WVHrmWgS6mhGwNvd2/j2wJPbDdmE9a7xpL9DaNYz2RT1BMi0QKXMbNhSUCQYTLg20QQk 4MeJ8NNAV8POMYalbm9uBditk4j7XpGIFzsJW5dQ4z0zZmXJitpHvnrKWo49ambbLzFf enuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gL+Solcd+nfVOiKqf58t8hgBxsJzytSAcC0Sys8N33fV/OaJGSs QlivGxgT5KjPaOQmoc30M0QWLG7IBvf+fbN4pYgpPUqB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5evf0C/wjMwA9OJ4GxNfc/ARtrCpUlihHwLAfhkX94tc32s5C1d4jqL8rpYcjAlBQxScWNzkfEzSPIc6+Skbl4=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a202:: with SMTP id h2-v6mr2076743ljm.72.1541701190204; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 10:19:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABuGu1o4E-Svt9N++RaFvO4SATt3Wh1w7gZb1OdBSVRCm7Odmg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCQmV5agORght0XWr27kDD+OkaEZcKcaDtE8wLG0Yi-YA@mail.gmail.com> <dee0fd86-40e3-e01d-6c70-2f467759be8b@tana.it> <93BFC1AD-9CC4-4CB4-89E1-A735AF5CD8E4@kitterman.com> <635dea71-2077-9a1a-e7a2-8594697e1068@tana.it> <AB35FEF5-74C9-400D-9A7F-543F9CAA215D@kitterman.com> <CABuGu1pXaXioyPTV6OXD3hWBXVjt5+kk0dqaZwbDcKaU+Y6q5A@mail.gmail.com> <446b8d5d-c059-a7d7-c38f-9c3a92241adf@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <446b8d5d-c059-a7d7-c38f-9c3a92241adf@tana.it>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 01:19:38 +0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZF55yaxZKYY8AQdcRfUr2WjMwfpd2FVWn3hCR67_E5eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: "<kboth@drkurt.com>" <kboth@drkurt.com>, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cac446057a2b478d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/U0OufdL2-0zvS9bmOuVS3kSwGfY>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Request to accept a new I-D into the WG work items
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 18:19:54 -0000

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 3:53 PM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:

>
> > and maybe it can solve the "PSL problem" if we can constrain the problem
> > space to just the DMARC issues instead of recreating the
> > DBOUND-solve-for-all morass.
>
> This problem is simpler than DBOUND.  Looking up text policies is common
> to a
> handful of protocols.  A careful wording might make some statements
> reusable in
> general, even if the focus is kept on DMARC.
>

Sure, the DMARC case is half of what DBOUND tried to tackle.  If DBOUND had
focused just on the DMARC use case, it would've succeeded.

If possible, we should be careful to create a solution that's extensible to
other use cases, not exclusive of them.  Reviewing what DBOUND tried to do
might be very instructive here.

-MSK