Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal
"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 02 November 2018 08:51 UTC
Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3013412F18C for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 01:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=dTLAl+ux; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=jX3m6PdJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C1a9logKqU70 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 01:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EB4912D7F8 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 9026 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2018 08:51:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=2340.5bdc1018.k1811; bh=rhPfc0w0mCfCvx6j/8BjsXMSznuON4PzCbiu5BbsoGo=; b=dTLAl+ux2ShmaDLJ+nK4zvggSB7vORwEQjIMCq9fVmcseqAv4vwcvKGQ+CTdxAyi2ALaE1mQ4TpebT7vjRWlneGxFzVsvj87Vf0zo/hIq/GhsMCf0cghsmmZYdwMZyvzryZHaa8vqBIT4Tnf+vCvrliUbpmV2V8y/27yy3AACtn1q+QzusicBncoWw/NCj3Scg+27BsiJH8Lts/65V7B0QrSfUPo3hMQbtf0Xv5BOWPe4DExFO2YpawSKu6RpaTA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=2340.5bdc1018.k1811; bh=rhPfc0w0mCfCvx6j/8BjsXMSznuON4PzCbiu5BbsoGo=; b=jX3m6PdJPwQqxzCzyg64swOPkHqMT5yu7zxPQtDgRKV3pK6Ydz/DAx1Oq7KgcFMIwRAtVrwWvTsFyHuuv6CzqdAayxehL0pV6j5tP39BaZ91Laqu9reSDlrjp+W7Kvsw/ZcFp0RG0pN9fQX+SNfwTD/udxBgEx5J5L6bQW4er1btOaI5rxuqAR0TQHSb9LyxG+KAUx/jdrZHR18OphS+TpXTq/i7r1iHAib5lcHq4WxgPVsFKT5ozuCbOX6ewXWN
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 02 Nov 2018 08:51:35 -0000
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 15:51:30 +0700
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1811021550560.13429@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: "Kurt Andersen (b)" <kboth@drkurt.com>
Cc: "dmarc@ietf.org" <dmarc@ietf.org>, Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1qOstiqvHfPSnZmfgHXx-VEAq543g9GWjWGaDQ3GxFUgw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9957335.dUWMaE32Bo@kitterma-e6430> <20181101235621.AF0B52007DFEBA@ary.local> <CABuGu1qOstiqvHfPSnZmfgHXx-VEAq543g9GWjWGaDQ3GxFUgw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UOEIq8IUgzhwud8OdAF9RJWCI5U>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 08:51:40 -0000
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: >> With the current spec, if you have two AMS or AS with the same i= >> that's invalid, > > No, it is not invalid. I mean ARC as it's implemented now, not in our multi-signing draft. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
- [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Kurt Andersen (b)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] ARC Multi Proposal John R Levine