Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Sat, 10 August 2019 06:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3021201EA for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 23:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=DsIBeYf5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=fpltFx9F
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lV2DWNpU0sqZ for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 23:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E735F12029B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 23:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA7C1F806CC for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 02:49:30 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1565419770; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=1qN0rTx0UPs8D6aaF+ijafTHcXgxHyuv3Zh1Qt+c7Sw=; b=DsIBeYf548zA3ioacjGxySRaFgdDDXxMYsuQSwS7NYPX/s4vQ7ryksCA Q40bf19pKVyIEe2PoCQ81gZWW6cDCQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1565419770; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding : content-type : from; bh=1qN0rTx0UPs8D6aaF+ijafTHcXgxHyuv3Zh1Qt+c7Sw=; b=fpltFx9FNyRvsbM0DFeXp7IxlIKZ4mCGsL0DrDRsV3zjB8vRaj/hx5T+ QFI8N10lcIx+F6nV87pQ4JcJ7sZLYSEKdVChGkik16oz4wISH2matE4Qmy GFCHuFHMAY60yCQJ3LIkmJDgn6rNtSf6KexBy478thTJAEj1AX60v74qDS y/pG+Wk6JA6OSkRL2TOa7mk/PbYC3rjpkTp42b+kHXiuGRspvS+ARe5eis sugBMCaO6XnqmzE+ijQggSEx03jPRduksJVpQ9ISVtUsZeKZWaPTBVUMua eIx9AtYGGA+HsS/eqvjO6mEI3cE5LUJVgBiGhM3aapdSbaENxEwMrw==
Received: from l5580.localnet (static-72-81-252-22.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net [72.81.252.22]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8707DF80033 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2019 02:49:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 02:49:29 -0400
Message-ID: <3966163.57549G4C0j@l5580>
In-Reply-To: <156541965631.2092.1955861073382730689@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <156541965631.2092.1955861073382730689@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UPJ2QTmkaJbtXuxuTVLSAOZU3Fg>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 06:49:34 -0000

On Saturday, August 10, 2019 2:47:36 AM EDT internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain-based Message
> Authentication, Reporting & Conformance WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication,
> Reporting, and Conformance) Extension For PSDs (Public Suffix Domains)
> Author          : Scott Kitterman
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dmarc-psd-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 14
> 	Date            : 2019-08-09
> 
> Abstract:
>    DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and
>    Conformance) is a scalable mechanism by which a mail-originating
>    organization can express domain-level policies and preferences for
>    message validation, disposition, and reporting, that a mail-receiving
>    organization can use to improve mail handling.  The design of DMARC
>    presumes that domain names represent either nodes in the tree below
>    which registrations occur, or nodes where registrations have
>    occurred; it does not permit a domain name to have both of these
>    properties simultaneously.  Since its deployment in 2015, use of
>    DMARC has shown a clear need for the ability to express policy for
>    these domains as well.
> 
>    Domains at which registrations can occur are referred to as Public
>    Suffix Domains (PSDs).  This document describes an extension to DMARC
>    to enable DMARC functionality for PSDs.
> 
>    This document also seeks to address implementations that consider a
>    domain on a public Suffix list to be ineligible for DMARC
>    enforcement.

Note the updated abstract and please review the changes to the first part of 
the introduction as I had to write new text there and not just incorporate 
msk's comments.  This covers all the pending work of which I am aware.

Scott K