IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports

Paypal security confirm your password now <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF883A10C7 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:18:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=MQu9dVwK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=xkEpb1PV
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RCAAsHEUsdGX for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F6B03A10D6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 81655 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 18:17:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=13ef5.5ff4ad54.k2101; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=K0/TGAXCFQ3eGp59Xn08ZKJUjRGny9xWksWK2zFaZzY=; b=MQu9dVwKrQ7k1jVPZkJzoVPXjUy+WaGhtx5LKvGKhIexNFQtqs4raYdVbDHNDNmuLMV+psPAFfh1VLKpWKd1kUUzggQl4TtIyOXfB2k6JSXZyjee80FBAOyL0pCa3AAX3jppzmiKq4Ct2Jx4RMEXYf/IlJVmQjQ3kaZOc1tYB1pd1+Mou0IqO99Vuh+MI60KlJE/lQbOF16ZvaDp5G8KTqybkNQuWcg1sGJD4GzkGxkKwCNzVKaQDWfMsBRC1JHMgKn6V/6i9BhDdGFrQu1LVDS6sDU/JRMgBW2nV4YzXjFdRcUgair9mm1XR61R3zugsOX64K5Dfdz7KQNH2cGcdQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=13ef5.5ff4ad54.k2101; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=K0/TGAXCFQ3eGp59Xn08ZKJUjRGny9xWksWK2zFaZzY=; b=xkEpb1PVoC/jjx/PR+su769jmmpmrGTYLVf8xgTgi9XcRhLH04SJRAn2MedN18fK2w8eSN1vDNWn8Ak1J4FeuvJBU4X5xSpyINzKobaRcgZcfa8hM7wJxU15RBYcK9VhBu1lfIdYl+V8H1PB2G6+MxA6isHczqiwxZ4MJ+ZUqzOD1TQFlQa6A+5PLGpOiy5TO2NZJLMakuHU27++aAju4y4O7arMvPGjwH87uYDf49LaDzR+t1i/MLAjqLy+9Kan4ZmttdvzIBBmtr/lH7ATxdN+dzcwyaZ93Hop3IwUAT/09nuP3x56pGdNeloU1cZisvJSCUmUPMaI5m3QIUpXMw==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 05 Jan 2021 18:17:55 -0000
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:17:55 -0500
Message-ID: <ae77d9f-6f63-16ca-903a-7cb463a7b58d@taugh.com>
From: Paypal security confirm your password now <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <FD45F9FC-46B0-40A9-ADC6-DDD7650D62F2@bluepopcorn.net>
References: <20210104174623.2545154CFF9F@ary.qy> <FD45F9FC-46B0-40A9-ADC6-DDD7650D62F2@bluepopcorn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-2132600213-1609870675=:69993"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UV5QxCJUEoFkWYhX9aWter_vI1k>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Ticket #55 - Clarify legal and privacy implications of failure reports
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:18:01 -0000

>> reputation for the domain. I have trouble imagining why anyone would
>> think it's a good idea to get alignment by using third party domains
>> that recipients don't know.
>
> Because recipients often can’t see (or don’t pay attention to) the domain 
> name and the reputation system you postulate doesn’t exist. OTOH, getting 
> alignment avoids a restrictive policy that might be associated with the 
> original domain.

I think you're saying that I can always evade DMARC problems by putting an 
address I control on the From line and nobody will notice.  That would 
mean that DMARC is useless.

If that's not what you're saying, could you clarify?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email