Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 02 August 2019 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D584B1200E9 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pvEVtNhxcaDs for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE77512014F for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id m8so40346054lji.7 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 13:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HA6pR4NOItNjcQ56LlYvLUhHueZUYnoNoI6IfpDUKbs=; b=XPx2tQoDS5H8bFCUZQRrZjlXuyGE4h0NXcVZfw3TL5rxhyt1mcYACRQa4rQB3yjUQG 55pvkw9TcoW8vR9RR/MS+DfDsECYDxI9hr3n1iMOXFwK38pn7xbbNikuJ4yXnXoVjaR+ +97isf2xxSQHlNB0/e8NilSQ82jhlNqyC/8bu90AQdZuI56CVZrmALdeei9EiX8kck0d yhNkRknnoEEa2Nc+ws0fxZ06q92cb0SxRMAVeE2ZTPcdN7Y5Z/qw8napURNIZoLTNfYu FXk+ouz4rjF4VhcGwX1OPUojMIEFK6d1WfIL9oRVpRI12izfAy+506PL1bG1gM64a65O uscw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HA6pR4NOItNjcQ56LlYvLUhHueZUYnoNoI6IfpDUKbs=; b=lq4+W6tvE8TMBp/YVbVLd50mT/TKTR2Qf9mlrgwJgB6//9pPx0EQFc33ono/OAe692 u7xZm0x8zDbq5QoFMYtP3nCRuMdQLZiEfJSfsHiyQP2g57UFEQhwG0ARoQqRtStiQ2Nt XILXbg6+DhF2G56bg+QYhlCuEd2gkDaJk46WgNaYC10JDfdfHq/y4atn9tbXgVtmEg2X 5fB/UC5UpiuJ0nXlepJRD/fdB6dJ9rrC0xDrIXRUVhW02QzjVwjy1D/hBqahWdQxh8TP QfdYlVzXpLhz+v/UKvJ1JRxxYHxRlS1+DWbOd8qLUHvAUYYvfCgjCTlkjwr/sU93NI5F cHyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW3o2gUwhTeMevt320Y5gB6nWzNBV1UCBobGiG2NZX7eDxPRm1l jDuUZqM/e4rPe5QwCsse47PxrXdYkpbjXhcweMdUDQ2x3Gc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz0YCKqXXWi2vD0SugWLFdLk387SIAviXiQMtfrk7xL4wcGIY9E/ql8N7qtWugnL3eLduTJE3UyrDqlEfv7i9g=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:988b:: with SMTP id b11mr5553669ljj.110.1564776113258; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 13:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <c676b42745c2c8114ec26eb1f405c9eb2e68c364.camel@aegee.org> <22f0d022-57f7-8b8f-0d88-18d1c77e990e@tana.it> <505750d4fb9c03050508255594c55f4517da3e6d.camel@aegee.org>
In-Reply-To: <505750d4fb9c03050508255594c55f4517da3e6d.camel@aegee.org>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 13:01:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwaDdfq6nkKubh2B=7PTZDt9E271z8tnq2bF-9KbwQQg3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000062452c058f27d4ab"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UgpfDQ1zF0n0KB4WwvkpTH2tpGI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] ESC for Failed DMARC Validation
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 20:01:57 -0000

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 10:52 AM Дилян Палаузов <dilyan.palauzov@aegee.org>
wrote:

> I mean an enhanced status code, as at
>
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/smtp-enhanced-status-codes/smtp-enhanced-status-codes.xhtml
> .
>

RFC7372 registered some for exactly this purpose (though not specific to
DMARC).  Its Security Considerations section talks about the privacy risks.

I don't know if they're actually in use.

-MSK